On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 08:14:58AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 18:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, folks. Requesting a freeze break for this PR (as it applies to
> > comps-f31.xml.in):
> >
> >
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/427
> >
> > In F31 'dnf-yum' is no more and 'yum' obsoletes it, but this
was not
> > changed in comps. As a result, clean installs of F31 (and Rawhide) have
> > no 'yum' command, as we clearly intend they should.
> >
> > This isn't likely to make any images go oversize as all the 'yum'
> > package contains is a symlink linking /usr/bin/yum to /usr/bin/dnf-3
> > and a manpage; /usr/bin/dnf-3 is part of python3-dnf which would
> > already be in all the images.
>
> I'm not sure if this is really an infrastructure thing to decide, but
> for FWIW, +1. :)
I thought I needed an FBR to poke comps at this point? I mean if
comps is in it's own 'fedora-comps' repo controlled by releng and is
more 'data' than anything to infrastructure.
everyone wants some extra bureaucracy I can file a bug, propose it
as
FE, we can vote to accept the bug as an FE, then we can vote on an FBR
to honor the FE...oh boy, I'm getting excited already!
Yeah, I don't know if it's worth all that.
How about we get the usual suspects to just vote in the PR?
kevin