On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Surely it'd be better suited as 'amber.fedoraproject.org', or
> > something like that, hopefully I'll be back later today/tomorrow
> > to help if needed.
> If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at
so that it can share cookies with our other
it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why. I'm
fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/
for stuff. But if this is
an application that end users will be using that doesn't seem quite
Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's targeted
at end users.
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching