On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Mike McGrath<mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I'm not sure if we have any memcached experience on the list but
I thought
I'd ask. Can anyone explain this:
http://pastebin.ca/1481219
Notice how memcached1 has a much higher hit rate and memcached2 has a much
lower hit rate?
The time for memcached1 is 5x less than memcached2 being up. That can
have an effect on caching as right after a system comes up its rates
are usually much higher and then over time fall off (iirc). I think it
would take bringing both up at the same time to figure out if there is
a true disparity over caching.
-Mike
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"