On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 17:13 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Ok this may seem silly, but after wading through a bunch of
today trying to find out which ones are for what.. could we
standardize on a convention? We have a couple :).
I like this one:
Once we have a convention, I can go and rename stuff to meet it (maybe
put the kickstarts under a git tree also?)
under a git, tree, sure - but do not, do not, do not, split the git tree
into staging/production branches. There's no point in that for the
also - unless there is a compelling reason to - why don't we assume that
all new builds are rhel6 - and therefore kvm?