On Sun, 28 Sep 2008, Jon Stanley wrote:
I'll throw a -1 in here (not that my vote matters for anything :)
).
Not because of any risk in the change, but rather it violates the
concept of a change freeze. It doesn't affect service, so if I went to
our change management meeting at work with something like this during
a change freeze I'd be laughed out of the room and told to wait.
In my mind, we either have change freezes and stick to them, or we
just forgo the charade.
Next time you get laughed at tell those laughing that they should work to
design a more flexable environment where risks are properly evaulated
instead of blindly feared. Having control over your environment is
important, when your environment has control over you, you've done it
wrong :)
-Mike
On 9/28/08, Xavier Lamien <laxathom(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> I'd like to implement the following global fix (its generating cron spam)
>>
>> in /etc/logrotate.d/func_rotate I'd like to change line 8 from
>>
>> /etc/init.d/funcd condrestart
>>
>> to
>>
>> /etc/init.d/funcd condrestart > /dev/null
>>
>> Can I get 2 +1's?
>
> +1
>
> --
> Xavier.t Lamien
> --
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
> GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
> Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
> Fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
Jon Stanley
Fedora Bug Wrangler
jstanley(a)fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list