On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Jon Stanley wrote:
> I think that gitweb-caching will help a lot here, I just need to
> ping warthog9 and get him sponsored, packages built and in
> epel-testing.
That and continuing to get the caching stuff pushed upstream would be
good. The discussion I've seen on the git list is generally positive,
they just want to ensure that it's done in a clean way that doesn't
negatively impact those who use gitweb without caching. That way we'd
be able to use the stock gitweb packages and not have to maintain
another package. :)
I was under the impression that gitweb-caching was a massive step away
from gitweb proper. Can anyone correct me on that?
-Mike