Mike McGrath wrote:
We're starting to get into backup needs that will include a lot
thats not redundant so backuppc's pooling won't really benefit us that
Ok, fair enough. I thought there was talk of having static content on
multiple servers, that's where BackupPC's pooling feature could come in
pretty handy, but I have no idea about what amounts of data we're talking.
Hopefully we'll be using both tape and disk backups. Once our
tray gets in we'll have to prepare to backup a couple TB of Binary
RPMs. Some of our backups will be going to disk, some will be going to
tape. Additionally it seems that bacula is more efficient at backing
Efficient in term of what precisely? And what backend are we using with
BackupPC right now?