On 02/02/10 16:22, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2010-02-02 03:02:18 PM, Tristan Santore wrote:
> I like the spam headers, and have yet to see a single message marked as spam,
> which originated from a user. And I am on multiple lists.
> Also, without the headers of the message, it is hard to say what is causing
> said scoring. It could be the users end or maybe even their fault, i.e. using a
> SMTP they should not. As it happened to one of my clients. Also, just because
> it is marked [spam], does not mean it gets removed, and I believe most people
> can use common sense in that regard.
>
Todd attached the message and full headers, and in this case, it seems
that the presence of a domain name with ".com" in the middle caused a
huge spam score, which definitely seems unreasonable.
I agree with Todd that the spam headers suffice without having to munge
the subject.
Thanks,
Ricky
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure If the score
originates from com2com scoring, then the filter needs
fixing, as it did not look for \.com but anything com. This looks more
like a bug that needs to be submitted to the relevant developers.
Regards,
Tristan
--
Tristan Santore BSc MBCS
TS4523-RIPE
Network and Infrastructure Operations
InterNexusConnect
Mobile +44-78-55069812
Tristan.Santore(a)internexusconnect.net
Former Thawte Notary
(Please note: Thawte has closed its WoT programme down,
and I am therefor no longer able to accredit trust)
For Fedora related issues, please email me at:
TSantore(a)fedoraproject.org