On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 07:35, Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 7:21 AM Kamil Páral
<kparal(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > It will be nice but I am not aware of any other system in place which
would
> > replace checks performed by autocloud.
> >
> > (CC'ed tflink and kparal)
> > Does taskotron provides capability to perform tests on Fedora cloud
Images
> > like booting images and other basic checks?
>
> (My email to the list was rejected because I'm not subscribed, let me
try again from the web UI...)
>
> Theoretically it is possible using nested virt. However, Taskotron is
going away as well. The replacement is Fedora CI:
>
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/
>
But Fedora CI is broken and/or vaporware. How can we replace Taskotron
with that?
Honestly.. weren't we saying the same damn thing about taskotron until
Fedora CI became the latest thing to rail about. It was constantly 'why do
you spend time on this broken crap' and then it becomes the 'oh why are you
replacing my favorite thing in the world'. I am pretty sure there are
multiple thesis and doctorates on the codependency that OpenSource
developers exhibit..
Also, I don't relish the idea of writing Ansible playbooks for
tests.
And I imagine most other folks don't. We don't need a Zuul-like system
for most package testing.
--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
--
Stephen J Smoogen.