Where i work, everything needs to be build and we use the following:
SVN -> build script -> rsync (static to webservers / dynamic to apps)
Really simple


Paulo


On 5/26/07, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@redhat.com> wrote:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Once upon a time Friday 25 May 2007, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>> Over the last couple of weeks we've been using puppet to distribute
>> static content across some of our application servers and proxy servers.
>>
>> Static content might include the new static webpage or an application
>> like our accounts system.
>>
>> This has proved to be a bit of an issue.  Puppet wasn't really designed
>> to do this and as such puts a noticeable load on the boxes while running
>> as well as causing longer runs.  Puppet works for this but we're
>> currently into it managing thousands of files and initial deploys take a
>> long time :)  In the past we'd discussed moving some things (like
>> turbogears apps) around using rpms.  We can do that with tg pretty
>> easily.  But what about other static content, images, things like that?
>>
>> This needs to be scriptable from start to finish, here's the options as
>> I see them:
>>
>> 1.  Straight nfs mount (boo)
>> 2. nfs mount to cron copy the files
>> 3. recursive wget to an http store somewhere
>> 4. rsync via ssh keys or rsync server (I'm currently leaning towards this)
>> 5. Figure out how to make puppet more efficient with large numbers of
>> files.
>>
>>
>> We've got a whole pool of sysadmins on this list.  How do you deal with
>> these issues in your current environments?
>>
> how about using cvs and scripting a checkout of the content?  i wuld say
> either that or rsync.   since alot of it like the accounts system is already
> in cvs why not use that?
>

I thought about this, the problem is some of our content needs to be
built first.

    -Mike

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list