On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:19:29AM +0100, Radka Janekova wrote:
>Â 2) GSoC is supposed to be a org wide thing, and spreading
info far and
wide within the project IS exactly what we should be doing, it prevents a
lack of interest AND the always inevitable ' Can I get a deadline waiver,
I only found out yesterday ( when the deadline was last wednesday) 'Â
1) As much as I appreciate that, the deadline is not "yesterday" yet, and
we are on top of it. I agree that it is org-wide, however it doesn't mean
that we should all now stand on our heads and flip tables. Wait for the
appropriate entity (Bex & CommOps) to take care of the organization of
things - and here I am not telling you to not think about ideas and what
to mentor, I am specifically referring to the above asked question "Does
Fedora have a page for Summer coding ideas for 2017?" and similar
questions, to which there is but a single answer - Not yet, working on it.
But this thread is not a follow-up of that particular question which you indeed
answered quickly and properly.
This thread is a follow-up on an email that has been sent to the infrastructure
list where someone volunteered to mentor a student and me just wanting to know
what this person is volunteering to mentor. I mean this is GSoC and I guess
we're still in the planning phase trying to gather subjects, right?
So if that person wishes to be a mentor, I guess they have a specific subject in
mind, no?
Well that was the source of my inquiry.
>Â And on that note I would like to ask this thread to end here
- it
doesn't belong into all these mailing lists.
>> Something something INFRA something something INFRA
I was referring to the following - not infra specific:
commops(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
join(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
Well that is infra :)
kernel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
nirik(a)fedoraproject.org,
pingou(a)fedoraproject.org,
And these last two are two people from infra.
Also, you may want to check your archive as this thread has only been occurring
on the infrastructure list, nowhere else (even if it was originally started
across multiple lists, I agree).
Pierre