On 04/25/2017 01:54 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi
<kevin(a)scrye.com> writes:
[Using foo-owner(a)fp.o as the default owner for bugs]
KF> But also disadvantages of people liking to see a name they can point
KF> to about the package or know who is cc'ed on the bug.
For years I've wondered why we don't do that, honestly. But I think it
might be weird that bugzilla separates the owner of a package from the
owner of a bug, and some of the interactions might be non-obvious.
Yeah.
When I take a bug, will the other maintainers still be notified?
Will
bugzilla send mail to foo-owner as well as CC'ing the maintainers, so
that everyone gets each message twice?
Yeah, if we made the default foo-owner and cc foo-owner, then when you
took a bug, everyone would get a email because foo-owner is on there as
cc, but you might get two (one for you and one via foo owner)
Will someone be able to log into bugzilla as foo-owner?
no.
What happens to bugs marked as private? If they're private to
foo-owner
then how will the actual maintainers see them?
Package maintainers would still need to be added to the right groups so
they could see private bugs. (fedora_contrib_private I think it is).
kevin