On 04/25/2017 01:54 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi
[Using foo-owner(a)fp.o as the default owner for bugs]
KF> But also disadvantages of people liking to see a name they can point
KF> to about the package or know who is cc'ed on the bug.
For years I've wondered why we don't do that, honestly. But I think it
might be weird that bugzilla separates the owner of a package from the
owner of a bug, and some of the interactions might be non-obvious.
When I take a bug, will the other maintainers still be notified?
bugzilla send mail to foo-owner as well as CC'ing the maintainers, so
that everyone gets each message twice?
Yeah, if we made the default foo-owner and cc foo-owner, then when you
took a bug, everyone would get a email because foo-owner is on there as
cc, but you might get two (one for you and one via foo owner)
Will someone be able to log into bugzilla as foo-owner?
What happens to bugs marked as private? If they're private to
then how will the actual maintainers see them?
Package maintainers would still need to be added to the right groups so
they could see private bugs. (fedora_contrib_private I think it is).