On 31 March 2012 15:29, seth vidal <skvidal(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:25:35 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
One concern I have with bcfg2 is lack of momentum. Since, for all
intents and purposes it is just puppet but in python.
Well I am more worried about xml versus playbooks. in any case I think
I will go with ansible .. will see how much I can learn while on
Percacet (hey its QA environment right before release.. how bad could
it be :)?)
One of the reasons I've been looking so hard at ansible is simple
doesn't require a client-side. It's all push-based. From a logging and
quietness-standpoint it should be significantly better especially for
our environment where if a host cannot reach lockbox01 we know we
cannot do anything else.
Stephen J Smoogen.
"The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance."
Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University.
"Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd