On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:54 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 16:56, seth vidal
> On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 12:05 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>> > > alternative proposal:
>> > It does help make things clearer and much more "granular" but
>> > say one host has a minor difference in how the service is configured,
>> > we would have to accomodate the tweak somehow either by cloning a
>> > service definition and making the new definition specific to the host
>> > or by adding in extra modifications using another specification file.
>> okay? and? We do that now, don't we? How is this different?
>> really, all I'm suggesting here is moving files around.
> okay - I've merged/mv'd the files in puppet master from servergroups to
> services and I've modified site.pp to reflect that.
> this is ONLY in master/production and it is DONE.
> I was starting to do it in staging and I thought "hmm, is now a good
> time to go ahead and move staging away from a branch and into
> the plan here would be to take all the staging bits and move them into
> either separate class definitions and/or subdirs (for the config files)
> so that we don't ever have merge/cherrypick issues between the two
/ == production
staging in a subdir
development in a subdir
Does that make sense?