On 02/20/2010 06:24 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:19:57AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 15:01 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> I would rather have the SIG be in a position to make the assumption
>> the Desktop and KDE spins are safe and well-cared of rather then the
>> Fedora Project itself doing so, and I would want to eliminate the
>> "exception to the normal process" for these spins so that we have one
>> less exception to the rules.
> I still don't see the Desktop an KDE live images as "spins". The KDE
> one is borderline.
While I do see the KDE Live image as a spin, the fact remains that I
can name a sizable handful of people who are constantly involved in
ensuring its proper working order. Messrs. Kofler, Dieter, Ngo,
Parrish, Řezník, and Boeckel come to mind off hand. I'm sure there
are quite a few others.
I fail to see how the number of people involved (that we know of, that
we can point out) is part of the definition of a "spin".