On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 14:25 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 15:57 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, James Laska wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:10 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > > > > * Should the semantic performance impact be significant,
> > > > > hosting a separate Fedora QA mediawiki (with semantic
> > > > enabled) a
> > > > > possibility?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > That is possible, for example we have a smolt wiki seperate from the
> > > > normal mediawiki install. The question of performance is, does it
> > > > only
> > > > impact pages deciding to use semantic or everything? We have lots
> > > > way to test the actual impact of using it.
> > >
> > > Good question. The feedback I have so far is it affects everything.
> > >
> > I just did some speed tests against the laptop.org
instance you linked to.
> > At this point I don't think thats a blocker but we may find something out
> > later.
> Package review in progress for both extensions ...
> mediawiki-semantic-forms -
> mediawiki-semantic - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490001
> I'm playing with the system locally to get more comfortable in this
> framework. Is it possible to get a dump of a subset of content from the
so I can get a better sense how things will look
> in production?
Yeah we can do that no problem. Can it wait until after the beta launches
though? (the 24th) It'll just be easier that way.
Still swamped on my end, but having a snapshot of the current fedora
wiki database that I can load into a test instance would help speed up
efforts to identify whether semantic is the short-term (F12) solution
Any updates on grabbing a db snapshot of the fedoraproject.org
Does this seem possible?