Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 09:40:50 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
What risk? Where can I read about that? Dennis has not replied to my
public mail either.
Currently, repoview is the only package that requires python-kid on that
machine. Who decides on what packages from that mysterious private repo
are "supported" on that machine or not? Seth?
Anyone with admin access to that box. If someone wants to install the
RPM on that box and make sure it works they are welcome to do so.
> I'm sorry but your local
> copy of yum 2.6 is not supported by the Fedora Infrastructure team.
That "team" has never before said anything about it. The API is needed as
the backend for the Extras multilib resolver, Extras repoclosure, ... and
some other tools. But maybe you misunderstand.
Perhaps I should drop the ball at this point and declare the code
unsupported, too. As I said before, this is turning into a negative
experience for me.
Ok clearly there's been some miscommunication because I have no idea
what you're talking about. Please tell us how we can re-create the
problem ourselves (and broken xml isn't what I'm talking about) What
commands do I need to run? What should I get? What do I actually get?