On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:49:47 -0500 (CDT)
Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Robin Norwood wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:09:20 -0500 (CDT)
> Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> > > On 2008-08-13 12:29:55 PM, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > > > Surely it'd be better suited as
> > > > something like that, hopefully I'll be back later
> > > > today/tomorrow to help if needed.
> > > If it requires auth, we'll probably want it at
> > > admin.fedoraproject.org
so that it can share cookies with our
> > > other applications.
> > >
> > it is probably time to better describe what goes where and why.
> > I'm fond of the admin.fedoraproject.org/blah/
for stuff. But if
> > this is an application that end users will be using that doesn't
> > seem quite right.
> Yes, it isn't really a fedora 'admin' app. As you said, it's
> targeted at end users.
Does it have an authed interface for admins or does it pull everything
from our repos and such?
It auth against FAS. First, anyone with a FAS account can log in, and
post comments and whatnot. Second, if the user happens to own a
package that provides a given application, she can edit the app's
description, and do things like delete comments and screenshots.
Third, if a user is a member of the 'amber_admins' group, he can do the
above for all apps, and a few other things.
Does that answer your question?
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching