On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-04-29 11:23:55 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Can I reverse the question? Instead of a pam_fas module, what about
> creating a way to export FAS information as LDAP, such that all
> LDAP-consuming apps would "just work", albeit not able to access the
> FAS-specific information?
I agree with this approach. In some distant future version of FAS, I'd
like to play with the idea of storing the data in LDAP while handling
our group sponsorship system in postgres.