I had a quick question - how we do change management in fedora? Is it
using the tracs ticket system? Do we have a process defined on the wiki
that someone could point me to?
Jose M Manimala
Can the script that generates the mail aliases for the package owners
be modified to only look at owners for current versions? I used to
own linphone and ortp but transferred ownership around the Fedora 8
timeframe. I'm still listed as an owner for earlier Fedora versions
but it's annoying to get bothered about packages I no longer control.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:50 AM
Subject: Broken dependencies: linphone
linphone has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
linphone-2.1.1-4.fc12.x86_64 requires libortp.so.7()(64bit)
linphone-2.1.1-4.fc12.i686 requires libortp.so.7
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
Hello guys, around a year ago i joined fedora proyect i've introduced myself
on this same list looking for someone who sponsors me but without reasons i
didnt follow you and i finished to dropping out my participation.
My name is Guillermo im 27 years old, im doing a bachelor on cs , i work in
a well know software security company based on Buenos Aires, as network
admin, i have experiencie in many linux and unix OS, and also have some
experience using cisco appliances, i can maintain simple code on pyhton,
perl php, and C and there is not much more that can i say about me or my
Surely i will hanging around on the next meetings so we can talk on deep.
I have just subscribed to fedora-infrastructure-list and signed up for
fedora account and CLA.
It is my honor to join you. Here is my brief introduction:
My name is Senwell Wu, I am from shanghai, China and 24 years old. Since
University in 2007, I have been serving for Quanta Computer till now and
recently I will go to another
company called Linpus which is an OSV of Linux. My job will be UI
development using C language
under Linpus Linux which is based on fedora.
Now, I am not very familiar with Linux, but I believe that I will be
skilled in linux's development.
Thank you for your time!
I'm an intern sysadmin in a company. I'm very glad that I can
participate in this fantastic project.
1. Capable of independent deployment of Ethernet-based Beowulf cluster
and diskless cluster,
including the parallel environment, the installation and parameter
configurations, as well as
parallel programs running and troubleshooting.
2. Ability to install and run high-performance computing mainstream
including HPL, SkaMPI, IOZone, disktest, etc. and can analyze the results.
3. Understand and be able to build service-based level of HA clusters.
4. Ability skillfully write Shell scripts and write Perl and PHP
programs in general level.
5. Familiar with IP SAN (iSCSI) deployment and configuration.
And if there are some projects about write administration shell
scripts I'd like to do. Meanwhile, I will try my best on other stuff I
Thanks all very much. I am pretty sure that I can learn much from this
20:02 < smooge> #startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11
20:02 < zodbot> Meeting started Thu Mar 11 20:02:43 2010 UTC. The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:02 < zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
20:02 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: (Meeting topic: Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11)
20:02 < smooge> thankyou zodbot
20:03 < smooge> mmcgrath is finishing up a meeting so I am just helping along
20:03 < smooge> #topic Roll Call
20:03 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Roll Call (Meeting topic: Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11)
20:03 * ricky
20:03 < smooge> smooge
20:03 * a-k is here
20:03 * nirik is around.
20:04 < smooge> mdomsch said he was here a second ago before I started meeting
20:04 -!- rdieter_ [~rdieter(a)pcp084943pcs.unl.edu] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:04 < smooge> mmcgrath will be here soon.
20:04 -!- biertie [~bert@fedora/biertie] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:04 -!- rdieter [~rdieter@fedora/rdieter] has quit Ping timeout: 265 seconds
20:04 * ayoung is here
20:04 < smooge> ok let me pull up the other standard things we do in the meeting
20:05 < smooge> #topic Meeting Tickets
20:05 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Meeting Tickets (Meeting topic: Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11)
20:06 < smooge> According to trac.. there are no tickets for this meeting :)
20:06 < smooge> am i missing anything people know?
20:07 < smooge> ok moving on
20:07 < smooge> #topic Alpha Release - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/9
20:07 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Alpha Release - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/9 (Meeting topic: Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11)
20:07 < smooge> alpha release was on Tuesday
20:08 < smooge> ok tickets
20:08 < smooge> sorry for my slowness guys.. my greps aren't as fast as I hoped
20:08 < smooge> .ticket 1944
20:08 < zodbot> smooge: #1944 (Fedora 13 Alpha Partial Infrastructure Freeze 16/Feb - 3/March) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1944
20:08 < a-k> # topic?
20:09 < mmcgrath> yo
20:09 * mmcgrath here :)
20:09 < smooge> hi mmcgrath
20:09 < mmcgrath> herro
20:09 < mmcgrath> smooge: you want to keep going or you want me to take over?
20:09 < smooge> hopefully I am helping here ... but its been real quiet. y
20:09 -!- gholms|work [~gholms(a)lateralus.spa.umn.edu] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:09 < smooge> you can take over...
20:09 < mmcgrath> alrighty
20:09 < smooge> you get people to say things :)
20:10 < smooge> #chair mmcgrath
20:10 < zodbot> Current chairs: mmcgrath smooge
20:10 < mmcgrath> hehehe
20:10 < mmcgrath> so this alpha release went fine, but with oddities.
20:10 < mmcgrath> I'll go ahead and close
20:10 < mmcgrath> .ticket 1944
20:10 < mmcgrath> and
20:10 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #1944 (Fedora 13 Alpha Partial Infrastructure Freeze 16/Feb - 3/March) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1944
20:10 < mmcgrath> .ticket 1990
20:10 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #1990 (Release Day Ticket) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1990
20:10 < mmcgrath> lets talk about .ticket 1992
20:10 < mmcgrath> .ticket 1992
20:10 < zodbot> mmcgrath: #1992 (Lessons Learned) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1992
20:11 < mmcgrath> So the first problem we actually ran into was that bapp1 had puppet disabled.
20:11 < mmcgrath> ricky: you around by chance?
20:11 < ricky> Yup
20:11 < mmcgrath> so having puppet disabled on bapp1 did what exactly?
20:12 < ricky> syncStatic is run by the apache user on bapp01 now, so that prevented it from getting the change to update the website
20:12 < mmcgrath> got'cha, so new syncStatic didn't make it on to the server so new website didn't make it to the proxy servers.
20:12 < mmcgrath> this is a monitoring thing, so when we get to monitoring which servers have puppet disabled, that one will go away
20:12 < mmcgrath> The other thign that happened was with our i2 netapp
20:13 < mmcgrath> Smooge and I just got off a meeting with the storage team about this.
20:13 < mmcgrath> basically it took several hours to transfer 16G worth of blocks.
20:13 < mmcgrath> the temporary fix was to put our sync traffic at a higher QoS then other traffic
20:13 < mmcgrath> long term though there was actually something wrong with the link... again.
20:13 < mmcgrath> they know and they're working on it
20:14 < mmcgrath> but it's certainly something we're going to want to track ourselves.
20:14 < mmcgrath> But, really the alpha went well even with those things... for non i-2 users anyway.
20:14 < mmcgrath> we had 85%+ good mirror rate
20:15 < mmcgrath> And the last thing I'd say is boot.fedoraproject.org
20:15 < smooge> and once the I-2 got up I think they had little issues too
20:15 < mmcgrath> Oxf13: ping
20:15 < mmcgrath> smooge: indeed
20:15 < mmcgrath> well, right now I just did boot.fedoraproject.org
20:16 < mmcgrath> but it dawns on me that's sort of a releng task.
20:16 < mmcgrath> one that I'm happy to do
20:16 < mmcgrath> but I wanted to check with Oxf13 as to where he things the SOP should sit, in Infrastructure or RELENG.
20:16 -!- kedars [~kedars(a)socks.wantstofly.org] has quit Ping timeout: 276 seconds
20:16 < mmcgrath> it's a minor distinction in this case, but making one group responsible will ensure that it always gets done :)
20:16 < mmcgrath> So anyway
20:17 < mmcgrath> anyone have any other questions about the alpha release?
20:17 < mmcgrath> alrighty
20:17 < mmcgrath> well
20:17 < mmcgrath> #topic Next freeze
20:17 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Next freeze (Meeting topic: Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11)
20:17 < mmcgrath> The next freeze is coming upretty quick
20:17 < mmcgrath> #link http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule
20:18 < mmcgrath> Infrastructure will be freezing on the 23rd.
20:18 < mmcgrath> that's less then 2 weeks.
20:18 < mmcgrath> so keep that in mind as you're deploying new things.
20:18 < smooge> so we should go slushy
20:18 < smooge> ?
20:18 < mmcgrath> slushy?
20:19 < ricky> Ice, slushy, freeze? :-)
20:19 < mdomsch> I have some MM fixes to get out, but may not make it before the next freeze :-(
20:19 -!- rdieter_ is now known as rdieter
20:19 < mmcgrath> mdomsch: anything I can do to help?
20:19 * mdomsch needs to test/fix one part, but it's been a month, so I forget which part it was ;-(
20:20 < smooge> sorry I meant, if you are going to be testing stuff for over 2 weeks.. not the time to do it.
20:20 -!- kedars [~kedars(a)socks.wantstofly.org] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:20 < mmcgrath> yeah
20:20 < mdomsch> mmcgrath, nothing huge; I'll get to it, or not...
20:20 < mmcgrath> I'll try to send a couple of reminders as the time gets closer.
20:20 < mmcgrath> the freeze always sneak up on us :)
20:21 < mmcgrath> anyone have anything else on that?
20:21 < smooge> we have updates to do this/next week
20:21 < mmcgrath> skvidal: ping
20:21 < skvidal> pong
20:21 < mmcgrath> smooge: lets talk about that
20:21 < mmcgrath> #topic Monthly Update
20:21 < smooge> okie dokie
20:21 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Monthly Update (Meeting topic: Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11)
20:21 < mmcgrath> skvidal: ok, so the list I've been working from with you is very nearing completion.
20:21 -!- rwmjones [~rjones(a)94-30-104-162.xdsl.murphx.net] has quit Ping timeout: 256 seconds
20:22 < mmcgrath> skvidal: think we'll be in any place to update soon?
20:22 < skvidal> yah - I think likely
20:22 < skvidal> though not sure TOMORROW is gonna happen
20:22 < smooge> thats fine tuesday sound ok?
20:23 < skvidal> sounds possible - depends what gets set on fire over the weekend
20:23 < mmcgrath> tuseday of next week sounds good, the freeze starts one week after that.
20:23 < smooge> yeah which was why I didn't want monday :)
20:23 < skvidal> unless there are A LOT of yum bugs that show up in f13a over the weekend
20:23 < skvidal> then I should have the time
20:23 < smooge> wghat are the changes you are working on?
20:24 < mmcgrath> smooge: I've been removing old hosts from puppet
20:24 < mmcgrath> skvidal's been working on having func use those hosts and coming up with a solid update script
20:24 < mmcgrath> or func program
20:24 < skvidal> smooge: you talking to me or mmcgrath?
20:24 < mmcgrath> I'm not sure what they're called.
20:24 < skvidal> okay
20:24 < skvidal> so here's all it ids
20:24 < skvidal> err is
20:25 < skvidal> 1. make it so our func certs aren't constantly screwed up
20:25 < smooge> ah
20:25 < skvidal> 2. make it so our func minions match our puppet minions
20:25 < skvidal> 3. have a script to let us do searches/installs/updates/etc from puppet1 w/o having to schlep all over the place
20:26 < skvidal> the script I worked on a couple of weeks ago
20:26 < skvidal> and got something mostly functional - but with room for improvement
20:26 < mmcgrath> smooge: do you know if this update will require a reboot?
20:26 < skvidal> the first 2 is what I spent the week working on to solve the problem that our func minions were completely wrong
20:26 < skvidal> and mangled badly from the phx2 move + rename stuff
20:27 < smooge> well it depends on if a kernel update gets dropped over the weekend :). At the moment I don't think so
20:27 < mmcgrath> yeah so I've been most of my last afternoon and this morning renaming hosts. I think I've got 3 hosts left and a little additional cleanup to do
20:28 -!- bpepple|lt [~bpepple|l(a)184.108.40.206] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:28 < mmcgrath> OK
20:28 < smooge> no the worst will be an openssh restart
20:28 < mmcgrath> so anyone have anything else on this?
20:28 < mmcgrath> <nod>
20:28 < skvidal> umm
20:28 < skvidal> I have a couple more things
20:28 < mmcgrath> skvidal: have at it
20:29 < skvidal> so I'll see if I can get a new func pkg out for all the hosts and a mechanism to update their minion.conf files to point to the puppet certificates
20:29 < skvidal> that's going to be the REALLY fun part :)
20:29 < mmcgrath> If you need any puppeting help let me know
20:30 < mmcgrath> you talking about a new func epel package or in the infra repo/
20:30 < skvidal> is minion.conf on the boxes puppet controlled now?
20:30 < skvidal> infra repo
20:30 < skvidal> for now
20:30 < skvidal> it'll eventually make it over to epel
20:30 < skvidal> but this is new cod
20:30 < ricky> I think so
20:30 < skvidal> e
20:30 < smooge> and if it isn't I will be happy to schlep what needs to be done
20:31 < skvidal> anyway - that's really all
20:31 < skvidal> the func-yum overlord script is fairly simple and could be added to by anyone as we go along
20:31 < skvidal> that's what's going to do the update/list updates/etc work
20:31 < gholms|work> I just wanted to mention that that is the greatest script name ever.
20:32 < mmcgrath> skvidal: and just becuase I'm overly paranoid... the time out bug? all fixed in the new version?
20:32 < skvidal> mmcgrath: the timeout bug was fixed long long ago
20:32 < skvidal> we've been running an old version of func for quite sometime
20:33 < dgilmore> sorry im late
20:33 < mmcgrath> k
20:33 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: no worries
20:33 < skvidal> dgilmore: BETRAYER!
20:33 < smooge> the only thing I wanted to ask was what would be prefered for making func 'groups/classes'
20:33 * skvidal giggles
20:33 < smooge> skvidal, hey hey hey.. thats me
20:33 < mmcgrath> Ok, anyone have anything else on this? If not we'll move on.
20:33 < skvidal> dgilmore: sorry, I just thought it was hilarious!
20:34 < dgilmore> skvidal: i had to get food for dinner and screwed up times
20:34 < smooge> nothing form me
20:34 < mmcgrath> ok
20:34 < mmcgrath> #topic Search Engine
20:34 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Search Engine (Meeting topic: Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11)
20:34 < mmcgrath> a-k: ping, want to take this?
20:34 < a-k> Sure
20:34 < a-k> I looking again at one of the candidates I eliminated from consideration earlier
20:34 < a-k> It advertises the most complete support for Unicode char sets
20:35 < a-k> I had eliminated it because I couldn't get it to work with SQLite
20:35 < a-k> ... and its user forum had no answered questions about how to get SQLite to work
20:35 < mmcgrath> which one was this?
20:35 < a-k> mnoGoSearch
20:35 < Oxf13> pong
20:35 < a-k> So I'm not there yet, but is there a db server I can use in pub test or do I need to install my own?
20:36 < a-k> Either MySQL and PostgreSQL should work
20:36 < mmcgrath> a-k: we'll have one for when we move to staging and production, but on the pt servers, just yum and install one
20:36 < a-k> OK. I'm still working on it locally, but I'll move to pt when I'm ready
20:36 < mmcgrath> cool
20:36 < a-k> I think that's it for now
20:37 < mmcgrath> a-k: thanks
20:37 < mmcgrath> Anyone have any questions for a-k about that?
20:37 < dgilmore> a-k: do we really care for sqlite support?
20:37 < a-k> I thought SQLite would be easier/preferable to MySQL or PostgreSQL
20:38 < mmcgrath> easier for a demo but probably not for production
20:38 < a-k> None of the other candidates had needed an external db
20:38 < mmcgrath> interesting
20:38 < mmcgrath> they all had their own local store then?
20:38 < a-k> The other ones use their own local db
20:38 < mmcgrath> yeah
20:38 < mmcgrath> alright, anyone have anything else?
20:39 < mmcgrath> alrighty
20:39 < mmcgrath> #topic Monitoring
20:39 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Monitoring (Meeting topic: Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11)
20:39 < mmcgrath> SO we talked about this on infrastructure for a bit.
20:39 -!- sonargal [~Test@fedora/SonarGal] has quit Quit: used jmIrc
20:39 < mmcgrath> it leaves us in an ackward position
20:39 < mmcgrath> do we just dump zabbix now?
20:39 < smooge> mmcgrath, did you want to get Oxf13 while he was here.
20:39 < mmcgrath> go back to nagios for a bit?
20:39 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: yes
20:39 < mmcgrath> smooge: oh right
20:40 < mmcgrath> Oxf13: did you want me to put the boot.fedoraproject.org as a releng SOP or an infrastructure SOP? it seems more releng, I'm happy to do it for as long as I'm part of Fedora but it should be documented :)
20:40 < Oxf13> that's a good question.
20:40 < Oxf13> it does sound relengy
20:41 < mmcgrath> it's pretty easy to maintain, I just want to make sure it actually gets done every release.
20:41 < mmcgrath> Oxf13: you're call. I'll write it up this week sometime, just let me know :)
20:41 * dgilmore thinks is a releng thing
20:42 * mdomsch says releng ;-)
20:42 < mmcgrath> alrighty, well unless Oxf13 says otherwise I'll put it as a marketing sop :-P
20:42 < mmcgrath> naw, I'll just put it in releng for now and if we change our minds later we can move it.
20:42 < mmcgrath> ok, back to monitoring.
20:42 < mdomsch> mmcgrath, unless you write a script to run when releng pushes a tree, to update bko automatically. then it's an infra ticket that gets opened and closed automagically
20:42 < ricky> I think zabbix has been taking away effort on improving our nagios monitoring, so I'm up for dumping
20:43 < Oxf13> releng works for us, and if you come with content that's even better (:
20:43 < mmcgrath> ricky: so the problem then is trending.
20:43 < mmcgrath> our cacti install
20:43 < mmcgrath> doesn't even seem to exist anymore :)
20:44 < ricky> Apart from request times for our websites, what do you want to be able to monitor that cacti can't?
20:44 < smooge> can I work on tht with someone?
20:44 < ricky> Well, easily can't
20:44 < mmcgrath> ricky: well, the problem is that we have to enter data in two locations
20:44 < mmcgrath> and that has inherit problems.
20:44 < mmcgrath> and doing custom trending in cacti can be tricky at times.
20:45 < ricky> What kind of problems? You still get your notification when something goes down and the general idea of movements, right?
20:45 < mmcgrath> anyway, lets take a look at our current zabbix install
20:45 < mmcgrath> err nagios install
20:45 < mmcgrath> and see how it goes.
20:45 < mmcgrath> ricky: ehh, I use trending a lot, to see when things started.
20:45 < mmcgrath> the alert is when a threshold started, but it's usually only a small part of the story.
20:45 < ricky> I've also not been crazy about running the zabbix agent public facing either.
20:46 < mmcgrath> for example when MM had the bloated pickle issues.
20:46 < mmcgrath> we didn't get the alert until days after MM was upgraded.
20:46 < mmcgrath> without trending we wouldn't have noticed when the problems started
20:46 < ricky> Yeah, but cacti would still have given you the big picture you needed, right?
20:46 < dgilmore> ricky: i rember you disabled catci
20:46 < mmcgrath> if it were in there.
20:46 < mmcgrath> trying to keep cacti and nagios in sync is goign to be a pretty big pain.
20:47 < mmcgrath> especially when we start wanting to monitor artibrary bits of info with cacti
20:47 < smooge> ricky, that is my major problem with it also
20:47 < mmcgrath> it gets complex pretty quick
20:47 < smooge> I think we should have one agent per server.. and thats func
20:47 < ricky> dgilmore: Probably, I don't running public facing stuff we're not using :-)
20:47 -!- rwmjones [~rjones(a)94-30-104-162.xdsl.murphx.net] has joined #fedora-meeting
20:47 < dgilmore> ricky: from memory there was a security bug in cacti
20:48 < mmcgrath> ricky: FWIW, I still use zabbix, it's sitting on my desktop now and beeps at me :)
20:48 < dgilmore> and rather than fix it you disabled it
20:48 < dgilmore> but i could be remebering wrong
20:48 < mmcgrath> that could be
20:48 < ricky> Sounds like me alright
20:48 < mmcgrath> well no rush to make a decision today. nagios alerts are still going out and paged alerts are going out
20:49 < mmcgrath> and at the moment, zabbix does have trending of some of the important things we need
20:49 < mmcgrath> like /mnt/koji usage
20:49 < ricky> The question is whether we should be spending time on improving nagios monitoring
20:49 < ricky> Like adding checks and keeping it in sync with hosts. That stuff has mostly stagnated since we looked at zabbix
20:49 < mmcgrath> yeah
20:49 < mmcgrath> I'm not sure how out of sync they are.
20:49 < mmcgrath> and zabbix has a lot of stuff nagios doesn't monitor.
20:49 < ricky> Is that a yeah to "we should be spending time on it" ? :-)
20:49 < mmcgrath> but that nagios doesn't really need to
20:50 < mmcgrath> just yeah, that stuff has stagnated
20:50 < mmcgrath> I'll take a look at things and try to get a better estimate of the work that needs to be done.
20:50 < dgilmore> ricky: i know we have hosts not in nagios
20:51 < mmcgrath> yeah
20:51 < mmcgrath> but most of our exernal service are still properly montiored by it
20:52 < mmcgrath> properly(ish)
20:52 < mmcgrath> ok, so more work to do, I'll get on that.
20:52 < mmcgrath> anyone have anything else? If not I'll open the floor
20:52 < smooge> all I want in a monitoring solution is something where adding a host to be monitorer can be done via puppet +files
20:53 < mmcgrath> yeah
20:53 < mmcgrath> ok
20:53 < ricky> Same here - the question seems to be what we want for a trending solution :-/
20:53 < smooge> I hate clicking on things or depending on having to click on things. But open floor
20:53 < mmcgrath> #topic open floor
20:53 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: open floor (Meeting topic: Fedora Infrastructure 2010-03-11)
20:53 < mmcgrath> ricky: I would love it if something like sar had the ability for arbitrary input :)
20:54 * gholms|work raises hand
20:54 < mmcgrath> gholms|work: yo
20:54 < gholms|work> Do you folks still plan on moving to Zenoss once 3.0 is released?
20:54 < mmcgrath> gholms|work: I don't think we ever planned on moving to Zenoss
20:54 < mmcgrath> so not to still, and no to zenoss 3.0 :)
20:54 < gholms|work> Heh, ok.
20:54 * gholms|work wonders where that idea came from...
20:54 < mmcgrath> I thought zenoss wasn't totally free?
20:55 < mmcgrath> I know it's not in Fedora yet, and that's a requisite
20:55 < gholms|work> It has a FOSS version. The big hangup was that it relied on bundled Python 2.4.
20:55 < mmcgrath> Ok, anyone have anything else to discuss?
20:56 < ricky> Just want to get this some visibility
20:56 < ricky> Jason Walsh has been working on poseidon, an OpenID provider writtin in pylons to replace the broken stuff in FAS
20:56 < ricky> So I'll be trying to get it setup with FAS auth on a publictest soon
20:57 < mmcgrath> ricky: excellent
20:57 < mmcgrath> happy to hear that one's been making progress.
20:57 < ricky> Which will hopefully be a good workout for the auth middleware in python-fedora :-)
20:57 < mmcgrath> ricky: are we the only users / potential users?
20:57 < ricky> Sorry, not sure what you mean
20:58 < mmcgrath> does anyone else use poseidon?
20:58 < ricky> Oh, no - it was started and written for this
20:58 < mmcgrath> k
20:58 < dgilmore> ricky: do you think we could have a way to use openid, present the cla and loow wiki edits etc
20:58 < dgilmore> and things like bodhi we could use openid sans cla
20:59 < dgilmore> for feedback
20:59 < ricky> Hm, that could get messy, as openids not linked to an existing FAS account could create all sorts of corner cases
20:59 < dgilmore> or am i all sorts of crazy
20:59 < mmcgrath> dgilmore: I think this is more of a provider
20:59 -!- mbonnet is now known as mbonnet_
20:59 < mmcgrath> to accept openid from places would require a different sort of work
20:59 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: ok
20:59 < ricky> This is more of a "packagers can login to upstream bugzillas, etc. with their OpenID" sort of thing.
21:00 < ricky> (If those exist - or even just commenting on blogs)
21:00 < dgilmore> cool
21:00 * abadger1999 shows up in time for open mic^Wfloor
21:00 < dgilmore> just throwing my crazy ideas out there
21:00 < mmcgrath> yup yup
21:00 < mmcgrath> time to close the meeting, if no one has any objections we'll close in 30
21:01 * dgilmore wants to hear abadger1999
21:01 < ricky> ... sing :-)
21:01 < abadger1999> dgilmore: Interpretive dance :-)
21:01 < gholms|work> Over IRC?!?
21:01 < dgilmore> abadger1999: seen it already
21:01 < mmcgrath> we can talk about this next time or in #fedora-admin if we want, lets not hold everyone here :)
21:01 < dgilmore> mmcgrath: close it up
21:01 < mmcgrath> #endmeeting
21:01 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Channel is used by various Fedora groups and committees for their regular meetings | Note that meetings often get logged | For questions about using Fedora please ask in #fedora | See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting_channel for meeting schedule
21:01 < zodbot> Meeting ended Thu Mar 11 21:01:31 2010 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot .
21:01 < zodbot> Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-11/fedora-meeting...
21:01 < mmcgrath> thanks for coming everyone@
21:01 < zodbot> Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-11/fedora-meeting...
21:01 < zodbot> Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-11/fedora-meeting...
21:01 < mmcgrath> !