infrastructure March 2007

infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

54 participants
62 discussions

Introduction
by David Nalley 13 Mar '07

13 Mar '07

Hi all, I'd be happy to help in anyway you can make use of me. My full time job involves admining a small bevy of Linux servers (mainly CentOS or Fedora). I have a few machines locally to test on (x86, x86_64, and sparc). I have been involved in various aspects of the Fedora Project, though certainly not as active as I should/could be. If you can put me to work, please do. Thanks, David Nalley

2 1

RecentChanages error
by Dimitris Glezos 13 Mar '07

13 Mar '07

We've got an error on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RecentChanges ValueError invalid literal for long(): not needed any more -d -- Dimitris Glezos Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B http://dimitris.glezos.com/ "He who gives up functionality for ease of use loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous) --

2 2

Re: Alpha Core 3 is available
by Oliver Falk 13 Mar '07

13 Mar '07

Am 2007-03-05 20:52, Oliver Falk schrieb: > Sergey Tikhonov schrieb: [ ... ] >> Thanks to RedHat who accept patches for Alpha. Hm. They do? Great. However. When core is opened for everyone, I hope that AC folks will join the community and get (write) access to glibc, xorg, ... If all alpha-specific things get %ifarch-ed, it shouldn't interfere with anything. To have all alpha specific patches in the fedora repository would be great. Maybe RH/FI (Fedora Infrastructure) is able to add alpha-builders to their infrastructure!? That's why I added them CC: :-) At least from plague I know it's possible to add passive builders to the list. This means *we* (people who own (spare) alpha machines)) can install machines with plague or whatever it will be named then, available to the FI team for building. I also guess it will not be too hard to add the idea of passive builders to the new koji (if it hasn't been coded yet). And well. If something doesn't build on alpha, it - of course - shouldn't break the 'normal' cycle (i386, x86_64, ppc(?))... For me questionable points are: Do we also want extras? Or only core? Will Red Hat support this idea? Will Fedora Board/Fedora Infrastructure support this idea? Who votes? Maybe Fedora Board? -of

5 17

Configuration Management SCM
by Mike McGrath 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

I'm ready to deploy the configs with puppet. Should we continue to use CVS, upgrade to SVN or try to use something like hg (even though a distributed SCM would have more negatives than positives IMHO for our infrastructure. /me doesn't care, but does generally dislike cvs. -Mike

7 8

[Fwd: Re: fedora-server-ca.cert missing?]
by Warren Togami 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

Anybody have any idea what this is? Warren -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: fedora-server-ca.cert missing? Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:07:51 -0400 From: Nuno Santos <nsantos(a)redhat.com> To: Warren Togami <wtogami(a)redhat.com> References: <45F58C26.1050907(a)redhat.com> Nuno Santos wrote: > Hi Warren, > > The links to the certs on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/UsingPlagueClientFaq are broken... > I managed to find the fedora-upload-ca.cert in cvs but can't find > fedora-server-ca.cert anywhere... do you know where I can get it from? > > Thanks, > Nuno > Never mind, found it in google's cache... but the links should still be fixed. Thanks, Nuno

2 1

Sponsor
by Mike McGrath 12 Mar '07

12 Mar '07

Anyone interested in sponsoring this? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/RFR/SELinux -Mike

2 2

Real-time project updates
by Luke Macken 10 Mar '07

10 Mar '07

Yo peeps, I created a Mugshot group for Fedora Infrastructure[0], and pointed it to the RSS feeds of the project Timelines for bodhi, koji, presto, beaker, pungu, and smolt. This way, members will get notifications on code commits, wiki changes, and ticket activity. Please feel free to add any infrastructure-related RSS feed to the group as well. Also, if you need a mugshot invite or something, drop me a line. luke [0]: http://mugshot.org/group?who=yWstkV2xGz93rQ

5 6

volunteers needed
by Mike McGrath 10 Mar '07

10 Mar '07

I have a list of like 20 things that need to get done. If you're a volunteer and would just like to help out, let me know. -Mike

3 2

Architecture
by Mike McGrath 09 Mar '07

09 Mar '07

So the infrastructure is maturing quite a bit right now. As part of that I'm spending some time to get some architectural documents together. I'd like comments from everyone and changes. My flowcharting is weak at best so take a look. I'll be sending them out as I create them so if you're interested in saving me some work feel free to pick a part thats missing and create your own document. I've attached the PNG's. The actual source files are at: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/architecture/?root=fedora Feel free to make edits and send me changes, seriously. These images are for the proxy servers and our frontend boxes. Right now I'm creating where we are with things, not where we will end up quite yet. -Mike

1 1

Primary DNS
by Mike McGrath 08 Mar '07

08 Mar '07

anyone have any issues if we move primary DNS off of fpserv and onto the torrent.fedoraproject.org box? What are your thoughts on using phx as the primary DNS site? -Mike

3 5

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

infrastructure March 2007