[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 906086] New: [abrt] ibus-1.4.99.20121109-9.fc18: bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb: Process /usr/bin/ibus-daemon was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906086
Bug ID: 906086 Summary: [abrt] ibus-1.4.99.20121109-9.fc18: bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb: Process /usr/bin/ibus-daemon was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) Product: Fedora Version: 18 Component: ibus Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: matbos@hotmail.fr
Version-Release number of selected component: ibus-1.4.99.20121109-9.fc18
Additional info: backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon -r --xim core_backtrace: crash_function: bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb executable: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon kernel: 3.7.4-204.fc18.i686 remote_result: NOTFOUND uid: 1000
Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #5 bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb at dbusimpl.c:1456 #6 on_worker_message_about_to_be_sent at gdbusconnection.c:2414 #7 _g_dbus_worker_emit_message_about_to_be_sent at gdbusprivate.c:501 #8 continue_writing at gdbusprivate.c:1489 #9 write_message_cb at gdbusprivate.c:1349 #10 g_simple_async_result_complete at gsimpleasyncresult.c:775 #11 write_message_continue_writing at gdbusprivate.c:1065 #12 write_message_async at gdbusprivate.c:1129 #13 continue_writing at gdbusprivate.c:1529 #14 write_message_cb at gdbusprivate.c:1349
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906086
fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(matbos@hotmail.fr | |)
--- Comment #10 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #1)
Created attachment 690558 [details] File: backtrace
#0 0xb7771424 in __kernel_vsyscall () No symbol table info available. #1 0x42036b7f in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:63 resultvar = <optimized out> resultvar = <optimized out> pid = 1109106688 selftid = 2094 #2 0x420384d3 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:90 save_stage = 2 act = {__sigaction_handler = {sa_handler = 0x95c09c0, sa_sigaction = 0x95c09c0}, sa_mask = {__val = {10000, 1275215872, 1275215872, 200, 3064987664, 1, 3065071336, 0, 3075392644, 4, 0, 14, 57, 1107823584, 157026752, 119, 1, 1275215872, 3065059760, 1275218752, 102, 1274311756, 0, 2097152000, 1275215872, 1109106688, 3064987664, 1274311734, 1275215872, 1274312200, 3065059760, 32}}, sa_flags = 1274434505, sa_restorer = 0x4c024000} sigs = {__val = {32, 0 <repeats 31 times>}} #3 0x4bf65b09 in g_assertion_message (domain=domain@entry=0x80620af "IBUS", file=file@entry=0x80624eb "dbusimpl.c", line=line@entry=1456, func=func@entry=0x8063660 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.23627> "bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb", message=0xb6b14648 "assertion failed: (connection != NULL)") at gtestutils.c:1877 lstr = "1456\000t\364K\306\371\365K\000@\002L,\373\365KmF\261\266\022\240\373K\000\000\000" s = 0xb6b119b0 "IBUS:ERROR:dbusimpl.c:1456:bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb: assertion failed: (connection != NULL)" #4 0x4bf66110 in g_assertion_message_expr (domain=domain@entry=0x80620af "IBUS", file=file@entry=0x80624eb "dbusimpl.c", line=line@entry=1456, func=func@entry=0x8063660 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.23627> "bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb", expr=expr@entry=0x80624f6 "connection != NULL") at gtestutils.c:1888 s = <optimized out> #5 0x08050f6c in bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb (dbus_connection=0x951bf50, message=0xb6b0af80, incoming=0, user_data=0x940c410) at dbusimpl.c:1456 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb" dbus = 0x940c410
I cannot reproduce your problem. Are you still able to reproduce your backtrace?
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906086
matbos@hotmail.fr changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Flags|needinfo?(matbos@hotmail.fr | |) | Last Closed| |2013-02-05 06:39:54
--- Comment #11 from matbos@hotmail.fr --- the problem is arrived with bug 905044
i don't know the difference with this other bug.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 905044 ***
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla