Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus-table setup does not store config settings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Summary: ibus-table setup does not store config settings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-table AssignedTo: cchance@redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: cchance@redhat.com, phuang@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Description of problem: ibus-table config is not using gconf to store configuration settings.
Steps to Reproduce: 1. change ibus-table config 2. restart desktop 3. use ibus-table
Actual results: configuration lost
Expected results: configuration to persist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Caius Chance me@kaio.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|me@kaio.net |extras-orphan@fedoraproject | |.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |dchen@redhat.com |.org |
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com 2010-07-14 20:20:21 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2010-11-04 06:41:03 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|12 |rawhide Flag|needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c |needinfo?(dchen@redhat.com) |om) |
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2010-11-18 22:24:25 EST --- No change I believe.
Is there anything or what is there to save? Would it be a useful feature?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-01-07 04:08:34 EST --- ping?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|dchen@redhat.com |jni@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Caius Chance me@kaio.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |me@kaio.net
--- Comment #6 from Caius Chance me@kaio.net --- phuang once suggested me to install ibus-gnome to have settings able to be saved. The info was for previous version of Fedora and ibus, so I think the package names / steps are different now. AFAIR ibus needs gconf registries to store settings.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #7 from Caius Chance me@kaio.net --- The solution of adding ibus-gnome (or similar) packages as dependency of ibus, was not welcomed by those who dislikes gconf/gnome in their gnome-free systems.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tfujiwar@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com --- Fedora 17 or later uses ibus 1.5. (ibus 1.4.99). The definition of ibus_config_set_value() was changed. The argument needs to be GVariant but ibus-table tries to send the raw values which were used in old ibus python.
# grep set_value /usr/share/ibus-table/engine/table.py self._config.set_value ( self._config.set_value( self._config_section, ...
So ibus-table needs to be modified to support ibus 1.5.
E.g. ibus-anthy converts the raw values to GLib.Variant values: https://github.com/ibus/ibus-anthy/blob/e835629a970eb788f773038c6fc05aaf3bfc...
http://code.google.com/p/ibus/downloads/list The numbers 1.3, 1.4... are supported ibus versions.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #9 from fujiwara tfujiwar@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #8)
Fedora 17 or later uses ibus 1.5. (ibus 1.4.99). The definition of ibus_config_set_value() was changed.
The get_value() is also changed. Now it returns GVariant value.
Also I noticed ibus-table uses set_icon() for ibus panel menu but icon menus are not enabled in GNOME GtkStatusIcon by default. So probably it's good to call set_label too:
E.g.
--- /usr/share/ibus-table/engine/table.py.orig +++ /usr/share/ibus-table/engine/table.py @@ -994,9 +994,11 @@ class tabengine (ibus.EngineBase):
if self._full_width_letter[self._mode]: self._letter_property.set_icon ( u'%s%s' % (self._icon_dir, 'full-letter.svg') ) + self._letter_property.set_label ( u'%s' % _("Full") ) self._letter_property.set_tooltip ( _(u'Switch to half-width letter') ) else: self._letter_property.set_icon ( u'%s%s' % (self._icon_dir, 'half-letter.svg') ) + self._letter_property.set_label ( u'%s' % _("Half") ) self._letter_property.set_tooltip ( _(u'Switch to full-width letter') )
if self._full_width_punct[self._mode]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
James Ni jni@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|jni@redhat.com |kent.neo@gmail.com
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Ding-Yi Chen dchen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dchen@redhat.com Assignee|kent.neo@gmail.com |pwu@redhat.com Flags|needinfo?(dchen@redhat.com) |
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Peng Wu pwu@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|pwu@redhat.com |mfabian@redhat.com
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #10 from Mike FABIAN mfabian@redhat.com --- Actually the saving of the property options already works both in f17 and f18. I.e. this bug has been fixed long ago already.
Nevertheless it makes sense to migrate the code to use the new pygobject3 API Fujiwaras San recommends to do this in comment#8.
I’ll try to do that.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #11 from Mike FABIAN mfabian@redhat.com --- I ported to the GOpbjectIntrospection API as suggested:
https://github.com/kaio/ibus-table/commit/526b8cf4e395dd8c6333b3ed4185596b11...
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ibus-table-1.4.99.20130110-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-table-1.4.99.20130110-1.fc18
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ibus-table-1.4.99.20130110-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-table-1.4.99.20130110-1.fc17
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- Package ibus-table-1.4.99.20130110-1.fc18: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ibus-table-1.4.99.20130110-1.fc18' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-0586/ibus-table-1.4.99.2... then log in and leave karma (feedback).
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed| |2013-01-23 11:14:06
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ibus-table-1.4.99.20130110-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513901
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org --- ibus-table-1.4.99.20130110-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org