https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300147
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(petersen@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- (In reply to David Shea from comment #2)
anaconda is not as able as gnome to make the determination of should or should not be considered a common or support language, and this solution is not appropriate.
Why is it not appropriate?
The i18n can help with the determination I think. I think it would be an iterative process - we have a reasonable idea of some of the most commonly used languages/regions and which layouts they use.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org