https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798871
--- Comment #8 from Shriramana Sharma samjnaa@gmail.com --- BTW I should note that the two characters 1CF8 and 1CF9 are not yet encoded but have been approved and are in the pipeline (http://www.unicode.org/alloc/Pipeline.html) and will be probably published with the next version of Unicode or so. As these are rare use characters I hope there is no problem with including them.
[I may remark that the encoding proposals for 1CF3..1CF6 and the two above chars were authored by yours truly too ;-)]