https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2435442
Bug ID: 2435442
Summary: Question: Can fcitx5 branch and build to EPEL?
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel10
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: fcitx
Assignee: yanqiyu01(a)gmail.com
Reporter: gerenlzn(a)hotmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i(a)cicku.me,
liangsuilong(a)gmail.com, pwu(a)redhat.com,
robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com, yanqiyu01(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Distro:Alma Linux 10.1
Because I am a KDE user and I have many XWayland software.
iBus XWayland and non-GNOME experience is suck.
So I wanna use fcitx5 on EPEL.
Plz branch and build fcitx5 series package to EPEL :(
Thx.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2435442
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2429736
Bug ID: 2429736
Summary: Can't login with diacritics in a password after update
Product: Fedora
Version: 43
URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/issues/1018
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: ibus
Keywords: Regression
Severity: medium
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: monteiro(a)protonmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
After a recent update fedora regressed and is no longer possible to login
normally with diacritics in the password field.
Apparently was a regression in IBUS and it was fixed already upstream but at
least not yet in current fedora silverblue 43.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Use diacritics in the password of a user.
2. Try to login in GDM right after booting with diacritics in the password.
Actual Results:
Diacritics don't work properly.
Expected Results:
Should be able to use diacritics in the password field.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2429736
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790554
Bug ID: 1790554
Summary: Keyboard layout of Kana Kanji wont show up
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
Status: NEW
Component: ibus
Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: sumukher(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
The keyboard layout for Kana Kanji Japanese doesnt show up
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora-Rawhide-20200112.n.0
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Fedora-Rawhide-20200112.n.0 WS from live boot
2. Open settings and navigate to Region and Language
3. Add Japanese Kana Kanji in the input source
4. Click the icon looking like an eye button which should open the keyboard
layout
Actual results:
Doesn't show up the keyboard layout
Expected results:
The keyboard layout should show up like it shows up for english
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2431892
Bug ID: 2431892
Summary: Provide a meta-package that prioritizes VFs
Product: Fedora
Version: 43
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: google-noto-fonts
Severity: medium
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: EpicTux123(a)proton.me
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, pwu(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hi there.
Currently, the "google-noto-fonts-all" meta-package installs many font
duplicates. Fedora seems to prever VF variants (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VariableNotoFonts ,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Noto_CJK_Variable_Fonts ), but the
meta-package installs both Static and VF variants of the same fonts. Example
from command "dnf repoquery --requires google-noto-fonts-all":
------------------------------------------------------
google-noto-serif-hebrew-fonts = 20250901-1.fc43
google-noto-serif-hebrew-fonts = 20251101-2.fc43
google-noto-serif-hebrew-vf-fonts = 20250901-1.fc43
google-noto-serif-hebrew-vf-fonts = 20251101-2.fc43
------------------------------------------------------
I would like to request the creation of a meta-package that prioritizes VF
variants and don't install their equivalent duplicates in Static variant.
For example, the meta-package would install Hebrew VF fonts, but not Hebrew
Static fonts.
This eliminates the duplicates, while still keeping the Static fonts in a
meta-package for the fonts that don't have VF variants.
Additional note: the current "google-noto-fonts-all" should probably install
the other "-all" meta-packages as well, since it includes all of their deps as
well.
Thanks.
Reproducible: Always
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2431892
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2434850
Bug ID: 2434850
Summary: gettext-1.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: gettext
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: matiwari(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dueno(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
matiwari(a)redhat.com, nphilipp(a)redhat.com,
petersen(a)redhat.com, sundeep_anand(a)yahoo.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Releases retrieved: 1.0
Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.26-4.fc44
URL: https://gnu.org/s/gettext/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_M…
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/898/
To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gettext
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2434850
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2429278
Bug ID: 2429278
Summary: CVE-2026-22693 harfbuzz: Null Pointer Dereference in
harfbuzz [fedora-42]
Product: Fedora
Version: 42
Status: NEW
Whiteboard: {"flaws": ["9a132224-d774-465d-b84b-e175909efd82"]}
Component: harfbuzz
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jmoroney(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
kalevlember(a)gmail.com, moceap(a)hotmail.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2428439
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Disclaimer: Community trackers are created by Red Hat Product Security team on
a best effort basis. Package maintainers are required to ascertain if the flaw
indeed affects their package, before starting the update process.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2429278
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…