https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212374
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Here is a summary of the base and bytestring hashes:
ghc(base-4.7.0.2-df338830bd5d424971e14b689f5c72dd)
ghc(bytestring-0.10.4.0-ed911e7019ca71e97666b106a852ff81)
- ghc-7.8.4-42.fc22
- ghc-7.8.4-42.2.fc22
-j2
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1780836 [5:07]
-j3
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1780842 [4:20]
ghc(base-4.7.0.2-f17d569edb6d8cdf3c82780f71c69a57)
ghc(bytestring-0.10.4.0-a38eb69cabfbe89e8d8f729239293977)
- ghc-7.8.4-43.fc22
-j4
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1777911
ghc(base-4.7.0.2-df338830bd5d424971e14b689f5c72dd)
ghc(bytestring-0.10.4.0-a38eb69cabfbe89e8d8f729239293977)
-j1
http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1777914
ghc(base-4.7.0.2-df338830bd5d424971e14b689f5c72dd)
ghc(bytestring-0.10.4.0-0b5b88348decbdcebbd54cb05aef5611)
- ghc-7.8.4-41.fc22
So the -41 (used a lot) ABI hashes seems hard to reproduce.
I think we should chose one of -j1, -j2 or -j3 and do another
test build to increase our confidence that their hashes are stable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Moc5w5suBn&a=cc_unsubscribe