Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=723558
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|ghc-rpm-macros |ghc-X11 AssignedTo|petersen@redhat.com |mathstuf@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-08-17 04:40:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12)
Until the fix is backported, should this be added to the F15 common bugs wiki?
That might be overkill: I don't know if anyone else has hit this problem?
Though I still wonder why libX11-devel-1.4.3-1.fc15.i686 was installed?
Having thought again about this I conclude that it is really up to the individual libraries to add the %{_isa} to their requires. Generically we can't be sure that an arbitrary -devel package is arch or noarch: though no doubt yum could handle this better.