[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664221] New: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
Alias: ghc-cautious-file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to
write a file cautiously
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spe...
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec
ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit,
pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix
-> posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 7 months
[Bug 1052117] New: ShellCheck source dir is named shellcheck-version/ not ShellCheck-version/
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1052117
Bug ID: 1052117
Summary: ShellCheck source dir is named shellcheck-version/ not
ShellCheck-version/
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: ShellCheck
Assignee: dridi.boukelmoune(a)gmail.com
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dridi.boukelmoune(a)gmail.com,
haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Description of problem:
It is unfortunate the current source code dir of ShellCheck
is named in lowercase while the package name is CamelCase.
I assume this comes about because the project is called
shellcheck on github... I think it would be good to point
this out to the author. I think it might also be problematic
if/when he ever wants to publish the package on Hackage.
Version: 0.2.0
Steps to Reproduce:
1. fedpkg prep
2. ls
Actual results:
ShellCheck/shellcheck-0.2.0
ShellCheck/shellcheck-0.2.0/ShellCheck.cabal
Expected results:
ShellCheck/ShellCheck-0.2.0
ShellCheck/ShellCheck-0.2.0/ShellCheck.cabal
Additional info:
A simple temporary workaround would be to rename
the dir in the spec file:
%prep
%setup -q -n shellcheck-%{version}
mv {shellcheck,ShellCheck}-%{version}
Then at least the Fedora Haskell "toolchain" scripts
will be break when they hit ShellCheck.
I don't think there is any offer Haskell cabal-based
package in Fedora which has this problem.
Alternatively the upstream cabal package could be
renamed to shellcheck but then the Fedora package
should really be renamed accordingly. So easiest
would be to make the upstream project/tarball name
consistent with the package name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CWMlRzShMU&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 7 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 664151] New: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
Alias: ghc-Diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151
Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in
Haskell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredi...
SRPM file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 8 months
[Bug 1051291] New: cabal-rpm should detect executable name when fixing rpath
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051291
Bug ID: 1051291
Summary: cabal-rpm should detect executable name when fixing
rpath
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: cabal-rpm
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
cabal-rpm currently assuming the executable name is the same
as the package name for BinLib packages with self-linked executables.
It should really extract the names of executables which are self-linked
from the cabal metadata. (This is already in the todo list upstream.)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cabal-rpm-0.8.7
Steps to Reproduce:
1. cblrpm -l spec highlighting-kate
Actual results:
%ghc_fix_dynamic_rpath %{name}
Expected results:
%ghc_fix_dynamic_rpath Highlight
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hPqECOgZCI&a=cc_unsubscribe
9 years, 8 months