July 2013 - haskell-devel - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 974721] Review Request: ghc-maccatcher - Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jul '13

05 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974721 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-maccatcher-2.1.5-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gu0Tcn5gfK&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974721] Review Request: ghc-maccatcher - Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974721 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|Ready | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BshKjsaFrJ&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974721] Review Request: ghc-maccatcher - Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974721 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-maccatcher-2.1.5-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-maccatcher-2.1.5-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HxzUXGiS5Y&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974721] Review Request: ghc-maccatcher - Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974721 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-maccatcher-2.1.5-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-maccatcher-2.1.5-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=UqVd2M5RX1&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974721] Review Request: ghc-maccatcher - Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974721 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bgoVGn1EFr&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-language-java-0.2.4-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-language-java-0.2.4-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gMB2PM1XAq&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-language-java-0.2.4-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-language-java-0.2.4-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bZ1u4KbkV5&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dN5kGHF1iu&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-libffi-0.1-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-libffi-0.1-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=crO9MPMqsT&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-libffi-0.1-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-libffi-0.1-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9z0xptl2yT&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XuTc6ljR5f&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 977652] New: ghc fails to compile files using llvm-3.3 on ARM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977652 Bug ID: 977652 Summary: ghc fails to compile files using llvm-3.3 on ARM Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: ghc Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: bos(a)serpentine.com, haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Description of problem: ghc < 7.8 (unreleased) seems not to support llvm > 3.2. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-7.4.2 llvm-3.3-rc How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. try to build a haskell package on F19 ARM with llvm-3.3pre Actual results: + ghc --make -no-user-package-conf Setup [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( Setup.hs, Setup.o ) wrong initalizer for intrinsic global variable [0 x i8*] undef Broken module found, compilation aborted! 0 libLLVM-3.3.so 0xb5e4f4f8 llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 36 1 libLLVM-3.3.so 0xb5e4f2d8 2 libc.so.6 0xb595ec60 __default_sa_restorer_v2 + 0 3 libc.so.6 0xb595d854 gsignal + 52 4 libc.so.6 0xb595ee54 abort + 408 5 libLLVM-3.3.so 0xb649580c 6 libLLVM-3.3.so 0xb649c4f4 7 libLLVM-3.3.so 0xb647828c llvm::FPPassManager::doFinalization(llvm::Module&) + 80 8 libLLVM-3.3.so 0xb647f1b4 llvm::MPPassManager::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) + 640 9 libLLVM-3.3.so 0xb647f2f0 llvm::PassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Module&) + 152 10 opt 0x0001830c main + 2532 11 libc.so.6 0xb594728c __libc_start_main + 276 Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: opt /tmp/ghc2007_0/ghc2007_0.ll -o /tmp/ghc2007_0/ghc2007_0.bc -mem2reg llc: /tmp/ghc2007_0/ghc2007_0.bc: error: Could not open input file: No such file or directory Expected results: No error Additional info: http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7996 There seems to be a fix for this for ghc-7.8 (commit db9b63105a54), which we can try test and backport. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Tr7NPkAlaa&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 9

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pHr7Bf42z4&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=70L6ib3wJH&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O0phf5P79n&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uPCHZKcc2U&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 947819] Review Request: idris - Functional Programming Language with Dependent Types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947819 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- I will try to clean up the rpmlint issues soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lD3Of4CRyd&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thank you for the review :) New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-language-java Short Description: Java source manipulation Owners: petersen Branches: f19 f18 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bNrd3begmk&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4vY0nMfnIV&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '13

04 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks a lot, Ricky New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-libffi Short Description: Haskell binding to libffi Owners: petersen Branches: f18 f19 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=g88v1Q0Eno&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> --- Looks good now. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PrJJP2o6Hx&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> --- Looks good now. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XRxT1cVRDu&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974722] Review Request: ghc-uuid - For creating, comparing, parsing and printing Universally Unique Identifiers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974722 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard| |Ready -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=M1eu1RhzAG&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=xCvhJGPUmy&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pzMcggmX5H&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974721] Review Request: ghc-maccatcher - Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974721 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- > Jens, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the > "ghc(maccatcher-2.1.5-2a37b19012ffa0b6954e320cc463cef6)" Requires in the > -devel package make it archful? Koji is showing that the i386 hash isn't the > same as the x86_64, so that should be fine. Right the ABI hashes are arch dependent so there is not really a problem but anyway I have fixed/changed this in cabal-rpm-0.8.2 which is currently in testing: and that should prevent the issue appearing in reviews in the future. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bLvmsESqqw&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 838780] Review Request: ghc-shakespeare-text - Interpolation with quasi-quotation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838780 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-shakespeare-text-1.0.0. |ghc-shakespeare-text-1.0.0. |5-1.fc19 |5-1.fc18 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-shakespeare-text-1.0.0.5-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EdcdhZLSEP&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974720] Review Request: ghc-SafeSemaphore - Much safer replacement for QSemN, QSem, and SampleVar
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jul '13

03 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974720 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|ghc-SafeSemaphore-0.9.0-1.f |ghc-SafeSemaphore-0.9.0-1.f |c19 |c18 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-SafeSemaphore-0.9.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=U3LKIRsQki&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980694] New: ghc-Cabal package doesn't install correctly
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980694 Bug ID: 980694 Summary: ghc-Cabal package doesn't install correctly Product: Fedora Version: 19 Component: ghc Severity: high Priority: unspecified Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com Reporter: slingamn(a)cs.stanford.edu QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: bos(a)serpentine.com, haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com Description of problem: The Fedora package of ghc-Cabal isn't visible to Haskell once installed. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc-Cabal-1.14.0-11.fc19.x86_64 Steps to Reproduce: 1. yum install ghc-Cabal 2. ghc-pkg list Actual results: Cabal does not appear in the output of `ghc-pkg list`: ``` [shivaram@good-fortune ~]$ rpm -q ghc-Cabal ghc-Cabal-1.14.0-11.fc19.x86_64 [shivaram@good-fortune ~]$ ghc-pkg list /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2/package.conf.d X11-1.6.0.2 X11-xft-0.3.1 array-0.4.0.0 base-4.5.1.0 bytestring-0.9.2.1 containers-0.4.2.1 deepseq-1.3.0.0 directory-1.1.0.2 extensible-exceptions-0.1.1.4 filepath-1.3.0.0 ghc-prim-0.2.0.0 integer-gmp-0.4.0.0 mtl-2.1.2 old-locale-1.0.0.4 old-time-1.1.0.0 process-1.1.0.1 random-1.0.1.1 rts-1.0 time-1.4 transformers-0.3.0.0 unix-2.5.1.1 utf8-string-0.3.7 xmonad-0.11 xmonad-contrib-0.11 ``` Expected results: Cabal should appear in the output. Additional info: No entry was created for Cabal in /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2/package.conf.d. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cF9U0L1q4Y&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 1

[Bug 923543] Review Request: ghc-yesod-platform - Meta package for Yesod
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923543 Bug 923543 depends on bug 923557, which changed state. Bug 923557 Summary: Review Request: ghc-asn1-data - ASN1 data reader and writer in RAW, BER and DER forms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923557 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oLWLXsnCLb&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 923557] Review Request: ghc-asn1-data - ASN1 data reader and writer in RAW, BER and DER forms
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923557 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed| |2013-07-02 21:44:29 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Closing out old Haskell Package Reviews that using macros like %ghc_devel_package, etc, which are now deprecated and no longer available in F20 Rawhide. Please update your package using cabal-rpm-0.8.x or later and re-open or file a new Review Request. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bvdheIpiIt&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 923543] Review Request: ghc-yesod-platform - Meta package for Yesod
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923543 Bug 923543 depends on bug 923618, which changed state. Bug 923618 Summary: Review Request: ghc-mime-types - Basic mime-type handling types and functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923618 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ripv4STZnH&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 923618] Review Request: ghc-mime-types - Basic mime-type handling types and functions
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923618 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed| |2013-07-02 21:44:23 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Closing out old Haskell Package Reviews that using macros like %ghc_devel_package, etc, which are now deprecated and no longer available in F20 Rawhide. Please update your package using cabal-rpm-0.8.x or later and re-open or file a new Review Request. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LasPqNoLRU&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 923609] Review Request: ghc-language-javascript - Parser for JavaScript
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923609 Bug 923609 depends on bug 923608, which changed state. Bug 923608 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-light - Lightweight UTF8 handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923608 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Ahf8gBmKmJ&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 923543] Review Request: ghc-yesod-platform - Meta package for Yesod
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923543 Bug 923543 depends on bug 923608, which changed state. Bug 923608 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-light - Lightweight UTF8 handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923608 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m3WVAjUc4W&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 923608] Review Request: ghc-utf8-light - Lightweight UTF8 handling
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923608 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed| |2013-07-02 21:44:12 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Closing out old Haskell Package Reviews that using macros like %ghc_devel_package, etc, which are now deprecated and no longer available in F20 Rawhide. Please update your package using cabal-rpm-0.8.x or later and re-open or file a new Review Request. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PK97sUk7E9&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 630303] Review Request: yesod - Creation of type-safe, RESTful web applications
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303 Bug 630303 depends on bug 838780, which changed state. Bug 838780 Summary: Review Request: ghc-shakespeare-text - Interpolation with quasi-quotation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838780 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0lN04hLLeJ&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 634048] Haskell Package Reviews Tracker bug
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634048 Bug 634048 depends on bug 838780, which changed state. Bug 838780 Summary: Review Request: ghc-shakespeare-text - Interpolation with quasi-quotation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838780 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 838780] Review Request: ghc-shakespeare-text - Interpolation with quasi-quotation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838780 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-shakespeare-text-1.0.0. | |5-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2013-07-02 21:41:50 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-shakespeare-text-1.0.0.5-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tNWiY0rjM8&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974720] Review Request: ghc-SafeSemaphore - Much safer replacement for QSemN, QSem, and SampleVar
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974720 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ghc-SafeSemaphore-0.9.0-1.f | |c19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2013-07-02 21:36:59 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- ghc-SafeSemaphore-0.9.0-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4ZrnBUvxzx&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 947819] Review Request: idris - Functional Programming Language with Dependent Types
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947819 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Maybe the F19 yum updated got mock and yum working together again. Anyway with it I managed to build the above package in a mock rawhide root. But quite a lot of rpmlint output: idris.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/libidris_rts.a idris.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/idris idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/libidris_rts.a idris.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/libidris_rts.a idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_bitstring.h idris.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_bitstring.h idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_opts.h idris.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_opts.h idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_stats.h idris.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_stats.h idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_gmp.h idris.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_gmp.h idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_stdfgn.h idris.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_stdfgn.h idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_gc.h idris.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_gc.h idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_heap.h idris.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_heap.h idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_main.c idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/libtest.c idris.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_rts.h idris.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/idris-0.9.8/rts/idris_rts.h idris.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary idris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=k7o6aBujin&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Jul '13

02 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8hrsfCpQlO&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SOyZ8lXFsr&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thank you Ricky for reviewing. The missing _isa should be fixed in: Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-language-java/ghc-language-jav… SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-language-java/ghc-language-jav… (just for the record this doesn't really affect Fedora Haskell libraries since our devel packages also implicitly require the base library packages with ghc ABI hashes but that is not obvious from the spec file:) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LKtWtCUIE4&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks for reviewing: the missing _isa is fixed also in cabal-rpm-0.8.2. Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-libffi/ghc-libffi.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-libffi/ghc-libffi-0.1-2.fc19.s… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nj5IhLjkM4&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974721] Review Request: ghc-maccatcher - Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974721 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=b7verJtxzb&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974721] Review Request: ghc-maccatcher - Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974721 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=S0HDJI5Kgs&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 974721] Review Request: ghc-maccatcher - Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974721 Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks for the review. Jens, correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the "ghc(maccatcher-2.1.5-2a37b19012ffa0b6954e320cc463cef6)" Requires in the -devel package make it archful? Koji is showing that the i386 hash isn't the same as the x86_64, so that should be fine. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-maccatcher Short Description: Obtain the host MAC address on *NIX and Windows Owners: mathstuf Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=q95qY8XqAD&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980133] Review Request: ghc-language-java - Java source manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980133 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |relrod(a)redhat.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |relrod(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> --- Two things, one is a nonblocker. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RequiringBasePackage (Add the %{?_isa} here) - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 1689600 bytes in 48 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation (This isn't a blocker, but the docs are over 1.6MB, so worth considering). ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ghc- language-java-devel [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-language-java-0.2.4-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-language-java-devel-0.2.4-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ghc-language-java ghc-language-java-devel 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- ghc-language-java (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(array-0.4.0.1-3b78425c10ff2dad7acf7e8c8ae014c3) ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc(cpphs-1.16-15d27b0080912629e5fe51cce6f4d42a) ghc(parsec-3.1.3-441f1388bc13de47c52a9ba8a23194f4) ghc(pretty-1.1.1.0-66181c695e6a2e173ba2088cf55cc396) libHSarray-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbytestring-0.10.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHScpphs-1.16-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSdirectory-1.2.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSfilepath-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSmtl-2.1.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSold-locale-1.0.0.5-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSold-time-1.1.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSparsec-3.1.3-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSpretty-1.1.1.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStext-0.11.3.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStime-1.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStransformers-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSunix-2.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libutil.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) ghc-language-java-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh ghc(language-java-0.2.4-0b0e647223770d9fdac16675bfcd278f) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(array-0.4.0.1-3b78425c10ff2dad7acf7e8c8ae014c3) ghc-devel(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc-devel(cpphs-1.16-15d27b0080912629e5fe51cce6f4d42a) ghc-devel(parsec-3.1.3-441f1388bc13de47c52a9ba8a23194f4) ghc-devel(pretty-1.1.1.0-66181c695e6a2e173ba2088cf55cc396) ghc-language-java Provides -------- ghc-language-java: ghc(language-java-0.2.4-0b0e647223770d9fdac16675bfcd278f) ghc-language-java ghc-language-java(x86-64) libHSlanguage-java-0.2.4-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) ghc-language-java-devel: ghc-devel(language-java-0.2.4-0b0e647223770d9fdac16675bfcd278f) ghc-language-java-devel ghc-language-java-devel(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-language-java: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.6.3/language-java-0.2.4/libHSlanguage-java-0.2.4-ghc7.6.3.so Source checksums ---------------- http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/language-java/0.2.4/language-ja… : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : ae68f6da1bfad4510c3822d82abcdbd6fcfd15d317e822a05ef5d772703763b9 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ae68f6da1bfad4510c3822d82abcdbd6fcfd15d317e822a05ef5d772703763b9 Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 980133 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ONQ37iB1iF&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 980123] Review Request: ghc-libffi - A binding to libffi
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '13

01 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980123 Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |relrod(a)redhat.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |relrod(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> --- Just one thing, fix the Requires on the -devel subpackage. I will approve when that is fixed. :) Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= (This is ignorable: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Haskell#Static_vs._Dynamic_Linking) - Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present. Note: Archive *.a files found in ghc-libffi-devel - Specify a fully versioned dependency in -devel: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ghc-libffi- devel [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-libffi-0.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-libffi-devel-0.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-libffi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ghc-libffi-devel ghc-libffi ghc-libffi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtime -> run time, run-time, rudiment 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- ghc-libffi-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh ghc(libffi-0.1-246dc5ea50873b4e73708a886ef510f1) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc-devel(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f) ghc-libffi pkgconfig(libffi) ghc-libffi (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f) libHSarray-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSbytestring-0.10.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libffi.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- ghc-libffi-devel: ghc-devel(libffi-0.1-246dc5ea50873b4e73708a886ef510f1) ghc-libffi-devel ghc-libffi-devel(x86-64) ghc-libffi: ghc(libffi-0.1-246dc5ea50873b4e73708a886ef510f1) ghc-libffi ghc-libffi(x86-64) libHSlibffi-0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-libffi: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.6.3/libffi-0.1/libHSlibffi-0.1-ghc7.6.3.so Source checksums ---------------- http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/libffi/0.1/libffi-0.1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 48387067c0f33bcfadf7a3bebbf48a55294202500f2b754229ffc8f12cb4f23c CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 48387067c0f33bcfadf7a3bebbf48a55294202500f2b754229ffc8f12cb4f23c Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 980123 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4yzqD3eCWg&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel July 2013