https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925993
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Also needs shakespeare-{css,i18n,js}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x2NDUkWMAq&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984806
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |haskell-devel(a)lists.fedorap
| |roject.org
Blocks| |925993 (ghc-yesod-core)
Depends On| |983901 (ghc-path-pieces)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=SDr235AibB&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923620
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|DEFERRED |DUPLICATE
Alias|ghc-monad-logger |
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 984800 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QjCA2kjVGR&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984800
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |923543 (yesod-platform),
| |925993 (ghc-yesod-core)
CC| |michel+fdr(a)sylvestre.me
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
*** Bug 923620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=30ylbrtRvj&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923578
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|DEFERRED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 984796 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=wo1AnFrKaz&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923558
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|DEFERRED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 984791 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=LT4PqxOtKm&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984791
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |788515, 923543
| |(yesod-platform)
CC| |michel+fdr(a)sylvestre.me
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
*** Bug 923558 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h8tewb0H0p&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982185
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
ghc-utf8-light-0.4.0.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oRCf4gaVSq&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982185
Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #2 from Ricky Elrod <relrod(a)redhat.com> ---
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: ghc-utf8-light
Short Description: Lightweight UTF8 handling
Owners: codeblock
Branches: f18 f19
InitialCC: haskell-sig
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O7YWd1cwar&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982163
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
ghc-threads-0.5.0.2-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KcCA7Z2prh&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982185
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
Looks fine to me.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
=======
- Static libraries in -static subpackage, if present.
Note: Archive *.a files found in ghc-utf8-light-devel
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#StaticLibraries
This is allowed for Fedora Haskell libraries.
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses
found. Please check the source files for licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
Note: Documentation size is 245760 bytes in 17 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ghc-utf8-light-0.4.0.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
ghc-utf8-light-devel-0.4.0.1-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint ghc-utf8-light ghc-utf8-light-devel
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'
Requires
--------
ghc-utf8-light (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57)
ghc(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f)
ghc(ghc-prim-0.3.0.0-d5221a8c8a269b66ab9a07bdc23317dd)
libHSarray-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
libHSbytestring-0.10.0.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libgmp.so.10()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
ghc-utf8-light-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
/bin/sh
ghc(utf8-light-0.4.0.1-0eaeca9465503ce57029cc9752e18fa8)
ghc-compiler
ghc-devel(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57)
ghc-devel(bytestring-0.10.0.2-4f93248f75667c2c3321a7a6761b576f)
ghc-devel(ghc-prim-0.3.0.0-d5221a8c8a269b66ab9a07bdc23317dd)
ghc-utf8-light(x86-64)
Provides
--------
ghc-utf8-light:
ghc(utf8-light-0.4.0.1-0eaeca9465503ce57029cc9752e18fa8)
ghc-utf8-light
ghc-utf8-light(x86-64)
libHSutf8-light-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit)
ghc-utf8-light-devel:
ghc-devel(utf8-light-0.4.0.1-0eaeca9465503ce57029cc9752e18fa8)
ghc-utf8-light-devel
ghc-utf8-light-devel(x86-64)
Unversioned so-files
--------------------
ghc-utf8-light:
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.6.3/utf8-light-0.4.0.1/libHSutf8-light-0.4.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so
Source checksums
----------------
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/utf8-light/0.4.0.1/utf8-light-0…
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
0524213aa380d5b882814332221bbf74ee3390060ac2aeee022923fc64775bf8
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
0524213aa380d5b882814332221bbf74ee3390060ac2aeee022923fc64775bf8
Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 982185
Package is APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QaWjRY59p7&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947819
--- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #13)
> I will backport this change to f18 and f19 ghc-rpm-macros shortly.
(Actually as far as I can determine it only affects ghc-7.4.2 (f19) and
ghc-7.6.3 (f20), and I have pushed an update for ghc-rpm-macros to
f19 testing.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BJR2HT5z8b&a=cc_unsubscribe