https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985082
Bug ID: 985082
Summary: git annex webapp sub-command missing
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: git-annex
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
Reporter: sdeasey(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mathstuf(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:
'man git-annex' describes the sub-command 'webapp', but 'git annex webapp'
returns:
git-annex: unknown command webapp
Looks like git-annex has been built without support for the webapp command,
which is git-annex's GUI and therefore quite important. I think it depends on
the Yesod web server.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
git-annex-3.20121009-3.fc19.x86_64
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. git-annex webapp
Actual results:
git-annex: unknown command webapp
Expected results:
Browser should pop up pointed at locahost.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nFHhySpJrc&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types with a default value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737228
Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-default - A class for types
with a default value
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 648247
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Spec file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-default.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc…
New dependency on ghc-dlist.
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc14.i686.rpm
ghc-data-default-0.3.0-1.fc14.src.rpm
ghc-data-default-devel-0.3.0-1.fc14.i686.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981134
Bug ID: 981134
Summary: ghc-deps.sh output wrong requires for selflinked
binlib executable if another lib-ver-hash installed
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: ghc-rpm-macros
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: petersen(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I tried to build leksah-0.12.1.3-11.fc20 locally with
ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-10.fc19 installed and ghc-deps.sh
generated
leksah requires "ghc(leksah-0.12.1.3-0e1be860272f4f39393a55766913f48e"
"leksah-0.12.1.3-9972b60cc4b3b265e0c50de687c275df)"
and hence leksah.x86_64 could not be installed.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-rpm-macros-0.98.2-1.fc19
How reproducible:
100%
Additional info:
ghc-deps.sh needs to be more careful about own library dependencies.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FyqdpB0suX&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973512
Bug ID: 973512
Summary: programs in ghc-compiler package have an executable
stack
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: ghc
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: dkholia(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bos(a)serpentine.com,
haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Many programs in the ghc-compiler package have an executable stack.
"This makes it susceptible to stack based exploits should another weakness be
found in the affected programs" (Steve Grubb).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-compiler-7.4.2-11.fc19
How reproducible:
You can use following programs to check if a package is hardened:
http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/files/rpm-chksec
OR
https://github.com/kholia/checksec
Steps to Reproduce:
Get scanner.py from https://github.com/kholia/checksec
$ ./scanner.py ghc-compiler-7.4.2-11.fc19.x86_64.rpm
...
ghc-compiler,ghc-compiler-7.4.2-11.fc19.x86_64.rpm,/usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2/ghc,mode=0100755,NX=Disabled,CANARY=Disabled,RELRO=Partial,PIE=Disabled,RPATH=Disabled,RUNPATH=Disabled,FORTIFY=Disabled,CATEGORY=None
Notice "NX=Disabled" field.
Upstream fixed this "bug" 4 years back. See
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/703
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7UEkleMjDV&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873385
Bug ID: 873385
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Summary: Random module fails on Doubles because of odd minBound
behaviour
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: imc(a)cs.ox.ac.uk
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: hugs98
Product: Fedora
I'm not sure how live this project is any more, but here goes...
$ rpm -q hugs98
hugs98-2006.09-11.fc17.x86_64
$ hugs
Type :? for help
Hugs> :load Random
Random> randomR (1::Double,10) (mkStdGen 3)
(
Program error: arithmetic overflow
The equivalent answer in ghci is:
(1.928919588914141,2109513658 1655838864)
This seems to happen because:
Random> minBound::Int
-2147483648
Random> toInteger (minBound::Int)
-18446744071562067968
Random> toInteger (maxBound::Int)
2147483647
The implementation of Random on Doubles uses the construction
"toInteger (minBound::Int)" to get an integer random number, but
the implementation of Random on integers falls over on values
greater than 2^32-1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837388
Bug ID: 837388
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Summary: Bluetile doesn't work properly with Java GUI apps
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Linux
Reporter: t.hlavnicka(a)centrum.cz
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: bluetile
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Bluetile doesn't work properly with Java GUI applications. Some Java GUI
elements are not gaining focus after mouse clicks (like text areas) and its not
possible to work with those elements.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bluetile-0.6-5.fc17
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.3-2.2.1.fc17.8
How reproducible:
Using any Java Swing application (like Netbeans) with text areas.
Actual results:
User can't write anything into text area.
Expected results:
Being able to write into focused text area.
Additional info:
This is tested only on x86 plaform. I am using Bluetile with Xfce desktop.
Bluetile is working properly in Fedora 15 and openjdk 1.6.0 (tested on x86 and
x86_64)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827975
Bug ID: 827975
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mathstuf(a)gmail.com
Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
Summary: ghc-hledger-lib-0.18 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: ghc-hledger-lib
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 0.18
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.17
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hledger-lib/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: FTBS: build failure on PPC64, `IO' is applied to too many type arguments'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803812
Summary: FTBS: build failure on PPC64, `IO' is applied to too
many type arguments'
Product: Fedora
Version: 17
Platform: powerpc
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: ghc-gio
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Description of problem:
[14 of 24] Compiling System.GIO.File.FileInfo (
dist/build/System/GIO/File/FileInfo.hs, dist/build/System/GIO/File/FileInfo.o )
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:269:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeBool':
fileInfoGetAttributeBool :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Bool bool
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:278:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeWord32':
fileInfoGetAttributeWord32 :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Word32 bool
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:287:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeInt32':
fileInfoGetAttributeInt32 :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Int32 bool
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:296:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeWord64':
fileInfoGetAttributeWord64 :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Word64 bool
System/GIO/File/FileInfo.chs:305:5:
`IO' is applied to too many type arguments
In the type signature for `fileInfoGetAttributeInt64':
fileInfoGetAttributeInt64 :: FileInfoClass info =>
info -> String -> IO Int64 bool
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sEL96Y (%build)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-gio-0.12.2-1.fc17
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.ppc-koji build --scratch f17 ghc-gio-0.12.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
2.
3.
Actual results:
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=439435
Expected results:
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cab-0.1.10 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788515
Summary: cab-0.1.10 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: cab
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Latest upstream release: 0.1.10
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.1.9
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/cab/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839234
Bug ID: 839234
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
mathstuf(a)gmail.com
Assignee: mathstuf(a)gmail.com
Summary: hledger-0.18.2 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: hledger
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 0.18.2
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.17
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hledger/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834876
Bug ID: 834876
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Summary: ghc-resourcet-0.3.3 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: ghc-resourcet
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 0.3.3
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.3.2.2
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/resourcet/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832656
Bug ID: 832656
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Summary: ghc-wai-extra-1.2.0.5 is available
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: ghc-wai-extra
Product: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 1.2.0.5
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 1.2.0.4
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/wai-extra/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to derive instances for data types
Alias: ghc-derive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712270
Summary: Review Request: derive - A program and library to
derive instances for data types
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/derive-2.5.2-1.fc14.src.rpm
Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122647
rpmlint output:
derive.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell,
Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
derive.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.
derive.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary derive
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
derive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell,
Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
derive.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C derive
The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant
information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary
brief and to the point without including redundant information in it.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-derive-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-derive-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/derive-2.5.2/libHSderive-2.5.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
Required for yi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712280
Summary: Review Request: ghc-ghc-mtl - A mtl compatible with
GHC-API monads and monad-transformers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 710045
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl.spec
SRPM link :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0-1.fc14.…
rpmlint output:
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ghc-mtl-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-ghc-mtl-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-mtl-1.0.1.0/libHSghc-mtl-1.0.1.0_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to write a file cautiously
Alias: ghc-cautious-file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664221
Summary: Review Request: ghc-cautious-file - Provides ways to
write a file cautiously
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file.spec?…
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-cautious-file-0.1.5…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-cautious-file.spec
ghc-cautious-file.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix -> posit,
pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix
-> posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-cautious-file-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US posix ->
posit, pos ix, pos-ix
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-cautious-file-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/cautious-file-0.1.5/libHScautious-file-0.1.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library implementing XDG base directory spec
Alias: ghc-xdg-basedir
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703503
Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-basedir - Haskell library
implementing XDG base directory spec
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file:
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir.spec
SRPM link:
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-xdg-basedir-0.2-1.fc14.…
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell
Alias: ghc-Diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151
Summary: Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in
Haskell
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
SPEC file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff.spec?attredire…
SRPM file URL:
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-Diff-0.1.2-1.fc14.s…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i ghc-Diff.spec ghc-Diff*fc15*.rpm
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-Diff-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-Diff-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-7.0.1/Diff-0.1.2/libHSDiff-0.1.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides interpreter monad
Alias: ghc-hint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712284
Summary: Review Request: ghc-hint - Library that provides
interpreter monad
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Depends on: 712280
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint.spec
SRPM file :
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-hint-0.3.3.2-1.fc14.src…
rpmlint output:
ghc-hint-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-hint-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-hint-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/hint-0.3.3.2/libHShint-0.3.3.2_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Required for yi.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907515
Bug ID: 907515
Summary: ghc 7.4.1 and 7.4.2 compile a correct gtk2hs program
such that it crashes with a segmentation fault
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: ghc
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: garrett.mitchener(a)gmail.com
Description of problem:
I wrote a Haskell program using gtk2hs. It works fine on Fedora 17 under ghc
7.0.4. However it crashes with a segmentation fault when compiled on Fedora 18
or rawhide(19). The crash occurs the first time an action added to the gtk
loop with timeoutAddFull runs.
I wrote a minimal test case that triggers the problem and posted it here:
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629
It seems to be a compiler or run-time-system bug in ghc 7.4.1 and 7.4.2 or
possibly gtk2hs, because the binary built on F18 or rawhide crashes when run on
F17, and the binary built on F17 runs without a problem on F18.
Furthermore, if I disable selinux on the kernel command line at boot time, the
crash vanishes in F18 and rawhide. I don't know why-- the crash doesn't
trigger any selinux error messages, just a segmentation fault.
Jens Petersen reported to me that the crash does not occur on 64 bit test
machines on Fedora 18, but he confirmed that it does occur on 32 bit test
machines.
I've run into pointer alignment problems with ghc before, where alignment
pragmas in C modules are somehow broken when the C module is linked with a ghc
program, so that may be the case here?
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghc 7.4.1 and
7.4.2.
How reproducible:
Every time
Steps to Reproduce:
Compile and run the test program posted in the haskell.org trac bug report
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/7629
I'm also posting the bug here in case someone else runs into it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VZ6WAcNDc9&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that provides difference lists
Alias: ghc-dlist
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664205
Summary: Review Request: ghc-dlist - Haskell package that
provides difference lists
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 634048
Classification: Fedora
SRPM link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist-0.5-1.fc14.sr…
SPEC file link :
https://sites.google.com/site/lakshminaras2002/home/ghc-dlist.spec?attredir…
rpmlint output:
rpmlint -i *.rpm ../ghc-dlist.spec
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.1/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=880135
Bug ID: 880135
Summary: Compile GHC packages with -O2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: ghc-rpm-macros
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: dag.odenhall(a)gmail.com
Problem:
If you want to compile your Haskell application with -O2, only parts of it will
be - most system packages are already built with -O1. All your own code is
going to link to those prebuilt binaries.
Does it matter?
Respectable people in the community claim -O2 really does produce better code:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11108746/difference-between-ghcs-o-and-o2
Cons:
The fedora packages will take longer to build.
Counter argument:
This shouldn't happen often though, and I guess is done by some build service
[koji?]. Users will just install prebuilt packages with no compilation time at
all and benefit from optimized binaries.
Footnote:
This is only about building the fedora packages with -O2. Our cabal-install
package should not be changed to default to -O2 for user compilation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=911725
Bug ID: 911725
Summary: ghc-ghc-devel not required?
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: ghc
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: vadie.developer(a)gmail.com
Created attachment 697959
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=697959&action=edit
script used to measure size of the package installed,although one could see it
through packagekit
Description of problem:
I am the culprit for this bloat problem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750317
ghc-ghc-devel is for hacking on ghc, it is the entir ghc platform(compiler,RTS
etc as a library). This pacakge should not be part of base install
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghc-7.4.1
this package takes up too much space (~ 240 MB installed)
and 34 MB
puts considerable strain on bandwidth and diskspace (OK not so much on
diskspace,but would be nice to get rid of it)
How reproducible:
just install ghc, 'yum install ghc'
Steps to Reproduce:
1.yum install ghc
2.say yes
3.
Actual results:
installs static library of entire ghc, which is not required for those
Expected results:
should not install ghc-ghc-devel package as part of base install.
Additional info:
This bug, is due to another request by me regarding quickCheck. Bug 750317
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750317
*note the title changed*
This is what Jens wrote : "
> Maybe we really want the ghc base package to be a meta package
> that pulls in "everything" to make the initial install friendlier
> for newcomers.
Ok, ghc-7.0.4-36.fc17 should provide a base metapackage
which installs all of ghc (ghc-compiler and ghc-devel).
So in future if you install ghc you will have a working
QuickCheck, etc out of the box.
"
I should have said no to it at that time itself, but i was not very
well-informed (not that I am now, just less ignorant),by adding ghc-ghc-devel,
we have internals/implementation of ghc as static library not static/devel
packages of quickCheck,parsec etc. {I am pretty sure about this}
I think it is correct and OK (infact necessary) to provide, -devel packages by
default for libraries of haskell, like ghc-parsec and ghc-parsec-devel, ghc-xml
and ghc-xml-devl,ghc-pango and ghc-pango-devel etc.
but ghc-ghc-devel is going too far. Only those who hack on ghc need this
(specifically who want to hack on this particular version others will track and
program for latest git/darcs version).
I think, it is possible to make this change. no ghc-ghc-devel in base
install,but whenever one installs any other library corresponding -devel
packages should also be installed
I didn't realize about this space problem, untill I ran out of space on my old
Fedora 16 on my root partition, found out that ghc installation took ~530 MB
installed space.
I am not sure about ghc-compiler package though, anyone more experienced in
haskell packaging can chime in.
I think this thing, needs better testing and some discussion so no need to
hurry out the changes, so that we make sure we do the right thing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=m5osKIWdlf&a=cc_unsubscribe
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902850
Bug ID: 902850
Summary: Lock Screen does not work in xmonad-gnome session
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: xmonad
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Reporter: conan(a)irconan.co.uk
Description of problem:
When "Lock Screen" is selected in the xmonad-gnome session nothing happens.
Running "gnome-screensaver-command -l" in terminal produces no output.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Version: 0.10
Release: 17.fc18
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to xmonad-gnome session
2. Select "Lock Screen" from the menu in the top right corner.
Actual results:
Nothing
Expected results:
Lock screen appears
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IfYeZBiMZD&a=cc_unsubscribe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639787
Summary: build darcs for EPEL-6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: darcs
AssignedTo: jeremy(a)hinegardner.org
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, jeremy(a)hinegardner.org,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
SSIA: I think we should have darcs in EPEL-6.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957876
Bug ID: 957876
Summary: File 'ifluatex.sty' not found
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: pandoc
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: petersen(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ejacobs(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: haskell-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, shakthimaan(a)gmail.com
Depends On: 861300
Category: ---
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #861300 +++
Description of problem:
When using pandoc on F18, I get:
File 'ifluatex.sty' not found
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
1.9.4.5-2.fc18
How reproducible:
Create a simple pandoc input.txt file. Try to convert it into a pdf using:
$ pandoc -t beamer input.txt -o input.pdf
Actual results:
pandoc: Error producing PDF from TeX source.
! LaTeX Error: File `ifluatex.sty' not found.
Type X to quit or <RETURN> to proceed,
or enter new name. (Default extension: sty)
Enter file name:
! Emergency stop.
<read *>
l.6 \usepackage
Expected results:
A pdf should be created
Additional info:
This does not appear to be fixed, even though it says it should be fixed in
861300
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2bLIE74yM6&a=cc_unsubscribe