[Bug 787972] Review Request: ghc-dotgen - Simple interface to build .dot graph files
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787972
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version| |ghc-dotgen-0.4.1-1.fc17
Resolution| |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2012-04-14 00:28:26
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2012-04-14 00:28:26 EDT ---
ghc-dotgen-0.4.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 1 month
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259
--- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2012-04-14 00:09:10 EDT ---
Thank you, Joe, for reaching out to us. :-)
We now have lifted-base (and monad-control) in Fedora at least. :)
I think we are gradually getting closer to being able to package the main
hackage.
Seems now we are still missing packages:
- bloomfilter
- hS3 -> Crypto, hxt*
- IfElse
- SHA
So yes it is probably a good idea initially to package merging the no-S3
branch,
since hxt is quite a few packages. Of course it would be nice to have
S3 support in Fedora later.
Ben: do you have time to try for that?
Joe: I assume adding an S3 flag to git-annex.cabal is not practical?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 1 month
[Bug 662259] Review Request: git-annex - Manage files with git, without checking their contents in
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662259
Joey Hess <joey(a)kitenet.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |joey(a)kitenet.net
Bug 662259 depends on bug 784802, which changed state.
Bug 784802 Summary: Review Request: ghc-lifted-base - Lifted IO operations from the base library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784802
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
Resolution| |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--- Comment #14 from Joey Hess <joey(a)kitenet.net> 2012-04-13 12:38:39 EDT ---
Hi, I'm the author of git-annex, and appreciate your work on getting it into
Fedora, since based on user feedback, this is currently one of the harder Linux
distributions for users to install it to.
I'd really like to make this happen. It seems that the main issue is build
dependencies. But there are some ways to work around that. git-annex's git
repository has several branches that avoid most of the newer build
dependencies. For building with ghc older than 7.4, there is the ghc-7.0
branch. For building without S3 (and its long chain of dependencies noted
above), there is a no-s3 branch. It's also possible to avoid monad-control
(which also avoids lifted-base), although currently the only branch I have that
does do is the debian-stable branch. There's also a no-bloom branch omitting
another recent build dependency. These all remove some features (and dropping
monal-control removes some robustness in one case), but still leave a quite
capable program.
I would be quite willing to put together a branch that omits any build
dependencies necessary for Fedora, and maintain it for the lifetime of the
Fedora release. (Not sure if I can commit to the lifetime of a Red Hat release
:)
Just get in touch with me.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 1 month