haskell-devel May 2011

haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
152 discussions

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 701376] Review Request: ghc-citeproc-hs - Haskell library for the Citation Style Language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '11

27 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701376 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-05-27 05:41:31 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-citeproc-hs Short Description: Haskell library for the Citation Style Language Owners: petersen Branches: f14 f15 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 701376] Review Request: ghc-citeproc-hs - Haskell library for the Citation Style Language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '11

27 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701376 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-05-27 00:45:44 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. :) (In reply to comment #2) > 1) Will the ghc-{package}-prof files pull in all base/devel packages across > f14,f15 and rawhide? There are no longer prof subpackages in rawhide going forward. For f14 and f15 currently prof should require devel which will pull in the base package (on primary archs). > 2) Regarding locales, I find that the xml mechanism is different than using .po > or .mo (correct me if am wrong here). I hope that the application will detect > and handle locales appropriately. Right I hadn't thought of it, and I think you're right that find-lang.sh only works for gettext files. Not sure there is anything we could/should do for this at this time, unless the Guidelines mandate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 707486] request to add %ghc_archs macro to fedora redhat macros
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '11

27 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707486 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-05-26 23:09:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > You need then to file bugs against redhat-rpm-config every time you need to add/remove arches. Well I don't think this is a big problem - new archs are only added very occasionally (say max once or twice a year) and anyway I would be happy to help maintain such a macro in redhat-rpm-config. > There is ghc-rpm-macros package which seems the best place where this > macro should be introduced. Note that this package needs to be updated in the > environment koji is ran because koji needs it in the time it parses src.rpm. Adding ghc-rpm-macros to @buildsys-build seems like overkill and anyway releng are basically vetoing this. I talked to dgilmore and he thinks the macro should really go into rpm itself, though not sure if upstream would accept the macro. Personally I still believe it would be easier for it to live in redhat-rpm-config for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 701376] Review Request: ghc-citeproc-hs - Haskell library for the Citation Style Language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '11

27 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701376 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 701376] Review Request: ghc-citeproc-hs - Haskell library for the Citation Style Language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 May '11

27 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701376 --- Comment #2 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-05-26 21:22:29 EDT --- [+]MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint -i ghc-citeproc-hs*fc16*.rpm ghc-citeproc-hs.spec ghc-citeproc-hs.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. ghc-citeproc-hs-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [+]MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+]MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [+]MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. Naming-Yes Version-release - Matches No prebuilt external bits - OK Spec legibity - OK Package template - OK Arch support - OK Libexecdir - OK rpmlint - yes changelogs - OK Source url tag - OK, validated. Build Requires list - OK Summary and description - OK API documentation - OK, in devel package [+]MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. License is BSD 3 clause variant. [+]MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+]MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Yes, LICENSE file is included in the base package. [+]MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+]MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+]MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. md5sum ~/Downloads/citeproc-hs-0.3.2.tar.gz 9d0c3861e858aeed2147ed2deb1deeb8 ~/Downloads/citeproc-hs-0.3.2.tar.gz md5sum ghc-citeproc-hs-0.3.2-2.fc15.src/citeproc-hs-0.3.2.tar.gz 9d0c3861e858aeed2147ed2deb1deeb8 ghc-citeproc-hs-0.3.2-2.fc15.src/citeproc-hs-0.3.2.tar.gz [+]MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Built on i686. [+]MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+]MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires. The prof files are mentioned directly instead of the template style of using ghc_pkg_deps. The understanding is that the prof files should pull in the devel and base packages across f14,f15 and rawhide. [?]MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly using the %find_lang macro Locale files are copied into /usr/share/citeproc-hs-{version}/locales. [NA]MUST: Packages stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+]MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. [NA]MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. [+]MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+]MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [+]MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+]MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [+]MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. Locale files are included in /usr/share [+]MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. [+]MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+]MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA]MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA]MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+]MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: {name} = %{version}-%{release} rpm -e ghc-citeproc-hs error: Failed dependencies: ghc-citeproc-hs = 0.3.2-2.fc14 is needed by (installed) ghc-citeproc-hs-devel-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 rpm -e ghc-citeproc-hs-devel error: Failed dependencies: ghc-citeproc-hs-devel = 0.3.2-2.fc14 is needed by (installed) ghc-citeproc-hs-prof-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686 [NA]MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [NA]MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section [+]MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+]MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should items [+]SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [+]SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Installed the package. Imported Text.CSL.Eval into ghci. Loads fine. [+]SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. cabal2spec-diff is OK. Two doubts: 1) Will the ghc-{package}-prof files pull in all base/devel packages across f14,f15 and rawhide? 2) Regarding locales, I find that the xml mechanism is different than using .po or .mo (correct me if am wrong here). I hope that the application will detect and handle locales appropriately. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 707486] request to add %ghc_archs macro to fedora redhat macros
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 May '11

26 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707486 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-05-25 21:12:20 EDT --- Ok good idea then I will ask rel-eng if they will add ghc-rpm-macros to the koji environmment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 707486] request to add %ghc_archs macro to fedora redhat macros
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '11

25 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707486 Jindrich Novy <jnovy(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |jnovy(a)redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2011-05-25 09:01:44 --- Comment #1 from Jindrich Novy <jnovy(a)redhat.com> 2011-05-25 09:01:44 EDT --- I'm not sure it is the best idea. Mainly from the maintainability POV. You need then to file bugs against redhat-rpm-config every time you need to add/remove arches. There is ghc-rpm-macros package which seems the best place where this macro should be introduced. Note that this package needs to be updated in the environment koji is ran because koji needs it in the time it parses src.rpm. Rel-eng ticket will likely be needed to accomplish it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 239713] No PPC64 build of ghc
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '11

25 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239713 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | AssignedTo|bos(a)serpentine.com |jskala(a)redhat.com Keywords| |Reopened --- Comment #18 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2011-05-25 05:01:16 EDT --- Jiri Skala has been working on this recently. http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1986 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 707486] request to add %ghc_archs macro to fedora redhat macros
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '11

25 May '11

1 0

[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 630299] Review Request: ghc-wai - Web Application Interface
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 May '11

25 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630299 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
16
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

haskell-devel May 2011