[Fedora-haskell-list] dist-f15-ghc and ghc-7.0.2 for f15
by Jens Petersen
Hi Haskell SIG,
I spotted that rel-eng already made the requested dist-f15-ghc (two
days ago :-/)
and I have started pushing builds to dist-f15-ghc. So far
haskell-platform-2011.2.0.0 and utf8-string have been backported and built.
Please avoid doing any new package builds in dist-f15 until
we have finished rebuilding everything in dist-f15-ghc.
The right way to do builds is to "git merge origin/master" into f15 branch,
"git push", and then "fedpkg (chain-)build --target dist-f15-ghc".
I will continue backporting builds tomorrow. When everything has been rebuilt
then I will move all the packages into dist-f15-updates-testing.
Thanks, Jens
13 years, 2 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 651656] Review Request: ghc-ltk - A UI toolkit for Leksah
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651656
--- Comment #4 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-03-26 02:00:10 EDT ---
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ltk.spec
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-ltk-0.8.0.8-2.fc14.sr...
rpmlint -i *.rpm *.spec
ghc-ltk.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah,
Leukas
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-ltk.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah,
Leukas
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-ltk-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah,
Leks-ah, Leukas
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-ltk-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-ltk-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Leksah -> Leks ah, Leks-ah,
Leukas
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-ltk-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/ltk-0.8.0.8/libHSltk-0.8.0.8_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648007] Review Request: ghc-binary-shared - Haskell library for sharing binary elements
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648007
--- Comment #5 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com> 2011-03-26 01:58:43 EDT ---
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-binary-shared.spec
http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-binary-shared-0.8.1-2...
rpmlint -i *.rpm *.spec
ghc-binary-shared.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-binary-shared.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell -> Gaskell,
Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-binary-shared-devel.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-binary-shared-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-binary-shared-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.
ghc-binary-shared-prof.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Haskell ->
Gaskell, Gaitskell, Skellum
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
ghc-binary-shared-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ghc-binary-shared-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/binary-shared-0.8.1/libHSbinary-shared-0.8.1_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 2 months
[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 648007] Review Request: ghc-binary-shared - Haskell library for sharing binary elements
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648007
--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel <mathstuf(a)gmail.com> 2011-03-24 20:19:53 EDT ---
ghc-binary-shared.src: E: description-line-too-long C This package adds the
capability to share elements created by the binary package.
ghc-binary-shared.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package adds the
capability to share elements created by the binary package.
ghc-binary-shared-devel.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package
adds the capability to share elements created by the binary package.
ghc-binary-shared-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-binary-shared-devel
ghc-binary-shared-prof.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package adds
the capability to share elements created by the binary package.
ghc-binary-shared-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-binary-shared-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-7.0.2/binary-shared-0.8.1/libHSbinary-shared-0.8.1_p.a
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 2 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 2 months