Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550105
--- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-10 12:47:24 EST ---
ok verified from upstream. Site is up now.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550105
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |rpandit(a)redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-10 12:44:27 EST ---
[x] Build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1912376 fine
[x] rpmlint - ok
ghc-parsec.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
ghc-parsec.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-parsec-2.1.0.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-parsec.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/parsec-2.1.0.1/libHSparsec-2.1.0.1-ghc6.12.1.so
ghc-parsec.i686: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/parsec-2.1.0.1/libHSparsec-2.1.0.1-ghc6.12.1.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Ignore
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-parsec-devel-2.1.0.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-parsec-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Ignore
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-parsec-doc-2.1.0.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
fine
[rakesh@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-parsec-prof-2.1.0.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-parsec-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-parsec-devel
ghc-parsec-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
ghc-parsec-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/parsec-2.1.0.1/libHSparsec-2.1.0.1_p.a
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Ignore
[x] name fine
[x] URL fine
[-] source ok
from srpm f09c7fcbf66c39cc4de2a50dbb1374ba82168b52 (sha1sum)
still to check from http://hackage.haskell.org/ as it went down
[x] spec name fine
[x] license ok (copy present) and source has marking
[x] source tree ok (no binaries present)
[x] archs - fine
[x] spec file legible and in american english
[x] BR's ok
[x] %files ok
[x] folders owned - ok
/usr/share/doc/ghc-mtl-1.1.0.2
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2
[x] source builds fine on fedora ghc archs
[x] no bundled dependencies
[x] %clean section ok
[x] filenames - ok (valid)
[x] profiling ok
[x] lib goes to %{_libdir}/ghc-%{ghc_version}/%{pkg_name}-%{version}
[x] new macros
APPROVED
You may ask for cvs request. I have done manual source traversal and it is
safe. Will verify whether it is actually from upstream in a while when site is
up.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550102
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |rpandit(a)redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-10 12:03:29 EST ---
[x] Build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1912264 Fine
[x] rpmlint
/tmp/gach7bjBZv/ghc-mtl.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
/tmp/gach7bjBZv/ghc-mtl.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag
Ignore
ghc-mtl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Ignore
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2/libHSmtl-1.1.0.2-ghc6.12.1.so
ghc-mtl.x86_64: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2/libHSmtl-1.1.0.2-ghc6.12.1.so
Ignore
ghc-mtl.src: W: macro-in-%description %ghc_lib_package
ghc-mtl.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
ghc-mtl.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
Ignore
ghc-mtl-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-mtl-devel
ghc-mtl-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-mtl-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2/libHSmtl-1.1.0.2_p.a
Ignore
[x] name fine
[x] URL fine
[x] source ok 883deca3cdf8052173c995b741bdedccc3c91440 (sha1sum)
[x] spec name fine
[x] license ok (copy present) and source has marking
[x] source tree ok (no binaries present)
[x] archs - fine
[x] spec file legible and in american english
[x] BR's ok
[x] %files ok
[x] folders owned - ok
/usr/share/doc/ghc-mtl-1.1.0.2
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2
[x] source builds fine on fedora ghc archs
[x] no bundled dependencies
[x] %clean section ok
[x] filenames - ok (valid)
[x] profiling ok
[x] lib goes to %{_libdir}/ghc-%{ghc_version}/%{pkg_name}-%{version}
[x] new macros
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |ON_DEV
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522953
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|update to darcs-2.3.0 |update to darcs-2.3.1
|stable cabal release |
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2010-01-09 08:13:26 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> hashed-storage requires mmap: bug 537971.
mmap is now approved.
> haskeline is actually part of ghc-6.12
> so may wait for that before updating darcs.
Though ghc doesn't actually ship it... :-/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537971
Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)tummy.com> 2010-01-08 23:39:24 EST ---
cvs done.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550711
Summary: ghc-GLUT-debuginfo contains no sources
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ghc-GLUT
AssignedTo: bos(a)serpentine.com
ReportedBy: ville.skytta(a)iki.fi
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, bos(a)serpentine.com,
loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com,
fedora-haskell-list(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 496968
Classification: Fedora
ghc-GLUT-debuginfo 2.1.1.2-3.fc13 contains no sources, which might be an
indication of $RPM_OPT_FLAGS (specifically -g) not being honored or binaries
being stripped too early. Is this expected behavior with ghc-* packages? See
bug 496968.
Same thing apparently with recent ghc-OpenGL, ghc-tar, and ghc-zlib Rawhide
builds.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.