On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 11:08 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:13 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> This patch doesn't seem right to me.
>
> Why doesn't "gssx_cred remote = {};" work?
I know it should work, and do not know why it didn't, but I pushed
this
patch anyway, I can put in something better later as long as clang
does
not complain.
I suspect that clang is complaining because zero isn't the right value
for the first field of gssx_cred. Simply removing that one byte should
be sufficient to make clang happy.
What is the actual complaint?