On mardi 30 janvier 2018 16:11:49 CET nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net wrote:
Hi,
Now the technical PR is submitted
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-srpm-macros/pull-request/1
and waiting for action from the go-srpm-macros maintainers, I took (quite a
long) time to refresh and flesh out the corresponding packaging guidelines
proposal. It should be fairly complete now:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging
I'd appreciate review to check if I have forgotten an important case, if
people understand the text, if they have enhancements or corrections to
propose, and so on.
Then I will push it FPC side again.
Actual practice should be fairly simple and self-explanatory, the proposal
length can be scary but that's because it documents all kinds of corner
cases that required digging through specs and mailing lists to find
resolution examples before. The basic Go packaging skeleton will be
sufficient is most cases without requiring to read any documentation.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello Nicolas,
Could you add two full examples, one for binary package, one for library
package, like in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/
Go#Sample_RPM_Spec
Putting it all together (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
More_Go_packaging#Putting_it_all_together) is nice but don't understand if it
is for a binary or a library.
Also, is there any plan to update Gofed with these new guidelines? If it's not
automated like today, we will lose time instead of gaining some in the end.
Best regards,
Robert-André