[Bug 1351818] New: etcd-3.0.0 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351818
Bug ID: 1351818
Summary: etcd-3.0.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: etcd
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: avagarwa(a)redhat.com, eparis(a)redhat.com,
golang-updates(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcajka(a)redhat.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
lacypret(a)gmail.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
walters(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 3.0.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.0.0-0.1.beta0.fc25
URL: https://github.com/coreos/etcd
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/760/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 1 month
[Bug 1396463] New: etcd fails to start on ppc64le platform
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396463
Bug ID: 1396463
Summary: etcd fails to start on ppc64le platform
Product: Fedora
Version: 25
Component: etcd
Severity: urgent
Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
Reporter: mkumatag(a)in.ibm.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: avagarwa(a)redhat.com, eparis(a)redhat.com,
golang-updates(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcajka(a)redhat.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
lacypret(a)gmail.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
walters(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
etcd fails to start on ppc64le platform
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
etcd-3.0.4-1.fc25.ppc64le
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install etcd(dnf install etcd)
2. systemctl start etcd
Actual results:
But fails to start the service. Tried manually to start but hitting with
following error:
[root@localhost ~]# etcd version
2016-11-18 03:43:02.015268 E | etcdmain: etcd on unsupported platform without
ETCD_UNSUPPORTED_ARCH=ppc64le set.
[root@localhost ~]#
This is happening because etcd project disabled the etcd support for all the
platform except amd64 architecture. So we need to patch in the code to run
exempt the ppc64le platform or we need to set ETCD_UNSUPPORTED_ARCH=ppc64le
param before starting the service.
Expected results:
It should run the etcd db without any issues.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 1392922] New: Unable to build Kubernetes with golang-1.7.3-1.fc26
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392922
Bug ID: 1392922
Summary: Unable to build Kubernetes with golang-1.7.3-1.fc26
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: golang
Assignee: jcajka(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, amurdaca(a)redhat.com,
golang-updates(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcajka(a)redhat.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
renich(a)woralelandia.com, s(a)shk.io, vbatts(a)redhat.com
Following errors pop up each time the Kubernetes is built with
golang-1.7.3-1.fc26 on ppc64le:
+++ [1108 13:24:10] +++ Warning: stdlib pkg with cgo flag not found.
+++ [1108 13:24:10] +++ Warning: stdlib pkg cannot be rebuilt since
/usr/lib/golang/pkg is not writable by mockbuild
+++ [1108 13:24:10] +++ Warning: Make /usr/lib/golang/pkg writable for
mockbuild for a one-time stdlib install, Or
+++ [1108 13:24:10] +++ Warning: Rebuild stdlib using the command
'CGO_ENABLED=0 go install -a -installsuffix cgo std'
+++ [1108 13:24:10] +++ Falling back to go build, which is slower
# k8s.io/kubernetes/cmd/kube-apiserver
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.ServiceProxyOptions:
relocation for runtime.strhash+92 is too big: -33556804
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSpec:
relocation for runtime.strhash+48 is too big: -33558176
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSpec:
relocation for runtime.strhash+92 is too big: -33558220
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSpec:
relocation for runtime.strhash+136 is too big: -33558264
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeCondition:
relocation for runtime.strhash+48 is too big: -33559208
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeCondition:
relocation for runtime.strhash+92 is too big: -33559252
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeCondition:
relocation for runtime.strhash+224 is too big: -33559384
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeCondition:
relocation for runtime.strhash+268 is too big: -33559428
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+48 is too big: -33560232
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+92 is too big: -33560276
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+136 is too big: -33560320
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+180 is too big: -33560364
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+224 is too big: -33560408
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+268 is too big: -33560452
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+312 is too big: -33560496
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+356 is too big: -33560540
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+400 is too big: -33560584
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeSystemInfo:
relocation for runtime.strhash+444 is too big: -33560628
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.AttachedVolume:
relocation for runtime.strhash+48 is too big: -33562144
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.AttachedVolume:
relocation for runtime.strhash+92 is too big: -33562188
type..hash.k8s.io/kubernetes/vendor/k8s.io/client-go/1.4/pkg/api.NodeProxyOptions:
relocation for runtime.strhash+92 is too big: -33566100
/usr/lib/golang/pkg/tool/linux_ppc64le/link: too many errors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 3 months
[Bug 1370720] New: flannel-0.6.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370720
Bug ID: 1370720
Summary: flannel-0.6.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: flannel
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eparis(a)redhat.com,
golang-updates(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jchaloup(a)redhat.com, linville(a)redhat.com,
nhorman(a)redhat.com, vbatts(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 0.6.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.5.5-8.fc25
URL: https://github.com/coreos/flannel
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/7421/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 4 months
[Bug 1386596] New: golang missing providers
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386596
Bug ID: 1386596
Summary: golang missing providers
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: golang
Severity: high
Assignee: vbatts(a)redhat.com
Reporter: grgoffe(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, amurdaca(a)redhat.com,
golang-updates(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcajka(a)redhat.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
renich(a)woralelandia.com, s(a)shk.io, vbatts(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1212096
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1212096&action=edit
flat console log of "dnf dist-sync"
Description of problem:
dnf --best --allowerasing install golang"*" gives error messages about pkgs
having no providers
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
golang-1.5.4-3.fc23.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.see desc
2.
3.
Actual results:
see desc
Expected results:
all pkgs of golang successfully installed
Additional info:
also attempted dist-sync which failed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 4 months
[Bug 1379484] New: P224 support for golang
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379484
Bug ID: 1379484
Summary: P224 support for golang
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: golang
Assignee: vbatts(a)redhat.com
Reporter: martin.thomson(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: admiller(a)redhat.com, amurdaca(a)redhat.com,
golang-updates(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcajka(a)redhat.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
renich(a)woralelandia.com, s(a)shk.io, vbatts(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
In golang 1.2, P224 was removed. This prevents the use of the system golang
with certain projects. My particular problem is that it won't run boringssl
tests. I couldn't find the original rationale, but I hope that the reason is
no longer valid.
Since NSS ships with secp224r1 (which isn't even in the NSS tree), I see no
reason that this should be excluded.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
I'm using golang-1.7.1-2.fc26
How reproducible: Perfectly.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. git clone https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl
2. cd boring/ssl/test/runner
3. go build
Actual results:
./key_agreement.go:349: undefined: elliptic.P224
(exit 1)
Expected results:
(exit 0)
Additional info:
I would have added a patch, but the repo doesn't even allow checkouts from
unauthenticated users. That's not very friendly to contributors.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 4 months
[Bug 1382965] New: etcd-3.1.0-alpha.1 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382965
Bug ID: 1382965
Summary: etcd-3.1.0-alpha.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: etcd
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jchaloup(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: avagarwa(a)redhat.com, eparis(a)redhat.com,
golang-updates(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
jcajka(a)redhat.com, jchaloup(a)redhat.com,
lacypret(a)gmail.com, lemenkov(a)gmail.com,
walters(a)redhat.com
Latest upstream release: 3.1.0-alpha.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.0.9-1.fc26
URL: https://github.com/coreos/etcd
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/760/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7 years, 5 months
Broken dependencies: atomicapp
by buildsys@fedoraproject.org
atomicapp has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On ppc64:
atomicapp-0.6.3-1.fc26.noarch requires docker
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
7 years, 5 months