My only recommendation would be to send your changes upstream when
you're done so that they can potentially incorporate them into the code.
--Mike
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi all,
Well since no one has commented on this I'm going to implement things as
described below.
Regards,
Hans
Hans de Goede wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Quoting myself from:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625
>
>---
>
>Before I forget the ugly name is because there are 2 alogg libraries out
>there, one which is called just alogg and one which is called AllegroOGG
>but still use alogg as soname. I hope we never need the other alogg
>otherwise I see a problem, but with this name atleast its clear which
>alogg this is:
>
http://lyrian.obnix.com/alogg/
>
http://nekros.freeshell.org/delirium/alogg.html
>
>---
>
>Thanks for the review! I've not imported this sofar, because the fact
>that debian has the other alogg packaged worries me, this means that the
>other one is used by some free software too, so sooner or later we will
>need to package it too. I think I'll just start packaging the other one
>right away so that I can find any conflicts now and come up with a
>resolution, before a bunch of packages depends on one or the other.
>
>
>---
>
>So there we are 2 different ogg support for use with allegro support
>libraries both installing:
>/usr/lib/libalogg.so
>
>One of them installs:
>alogg.h
>
>And the other:
>alogg/alogg.h
>
>Which also seems like an accident waiting to happen. I'm thinking of
>solving this by:
>-give AllegroOGG a new soname: libAllegroOGG.so, or should I give them
> both a new name, and in that case what should I use for alogg?
>-putting all the header files of both in seperate dirs under include:
> /usr/include/allog/(alogg/alogg.h)
> /usr/include/AllegroOGG/(allogg.h)
>-modifying allog-config todo the right thing for alogg
>-use pkgconfig for AllegroOgg
>-patch AllegroOGG using programs to use pkgconfig. Currently only raidem
> can use AllegroOGG (I have a new version ready which adds ogg support
> as a replacement for the stripped out mp3 support, giving raidem its
> background music back).
>
>
>So does this sound like a plan if not, what do you suggest?
>
>Regards,
>
>Hans
>
_______________________________________________
Fedora-games-list mailing list
Fedora-games-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list