On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:00, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Does not following this rule sound reasonable / any
objections?
>
> Would it make sense to have ode-opcode, demo-effects-opcode,
> crystal-space-opcode etc packages? That is, split the opcode part
> into a seperate subpackage that does not require the main package, and
> if one project can use another's opcode it can do so?
Erm, no I think the effort needed to make that work is not worth the gain.
+1
Regards,
Hans
--
[]'s
Eitch
http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/
"Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds