Do we know if the wesnoth, cdda etc maintainers are also in the SIG
mailing list/FAS group?
It seems we will be getting a pagure/src group very soon, and if
everyone on this mailing list joins the FAS group, I believe it will
automatically put us in it. So we should be able to add the SIG to any
repos willing to participate once that's ready.
As a follow up; do we want to limit the SIG to just games, or also game
related packages? i.e. does SCUMMVM count as a games SIG package?
Lutris? What about more game dev related things, like godot or mygui?
-Claire R
On 7/29/25 09:10, Gwyn Ciesla via Fedora Games SIG wrote:
> That's not a bad idea. Historically the SIG has been mostly centered
> around the email list and helping with reviews for new games.
>
> If there are bugs that need quick squashing, this list is a good place
> to contact, as I think most game package maintainers are on it, and
> several, including my self, are provenpackagers and can commit to
> nearly anything.
>
> I also maintain wesnoth and 0ad, FYI. :) FAS:limb
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
> ------------------------------------------------
> in your fear, seek only peace
> in your fear, seek only love
> -d. bowie
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home> secure email.
>
> On Monday, July 28th, 2025 at 5:03 PM, Claire R via Fedora Games SIG
> <games(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> We have a lot of game repositories on here, for instance `0ad`,
>> `stratagus`, `wesnoth`, `cdda` and now `openmw`. Are all of these
>> projects part of the gaming SIG? If not, do we want to reach out to
>> the maintainers and bring them formally into the SIG? There's also an
>> issue on pagure <https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12848> to create a
>> group on dist-git for the SIG; do we want to add the SIG as a
>> collaborator on all of these projects (or at least ticket
>> permissions)? I imagine that'd be up to each individual maintainer,
>> of course.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Claire R
>>
>
Hello all,
We have a lot of game repositories on here, for instance `0ad`,
`stratagus`, `wesnoth`, `cdda` and now `openmw`. Are all of these
projects part of the gaming SIG? If not, do we want to reach out to the
maintainers and bring them formally into the SIG? There's also an issue
on pagure <https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12848> to create a group on
dist-git for the SIG; do we want to add the SIG as a collaborator on all
of these projects (or at least ticket permissions)? I imagine that'd be
up to each individual maintainer, of course.
Thanks,
Claire R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2025-07-28 04:04:15
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2025-c1cbce3f21 (openmw-0.49.0-2.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43
stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721
Cristian Le <fedora(a)lecris.me> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #33 from Cristian Le <fedora(a)lecris.me> ---
There are a few ExcludeArch that appear to be needed, but you can add them at
the import. The license text is corrected which is the most important, and I
hope it can be corrected in the original spec files as well. Other things can
be investigated later on.
Package Approved!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721
Cristian Le <fedora(a)lecris.me> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #31 from Cristian Le <fedora(a)lecris.me> ---
LGTM. One minor comment about `csxcb.patch`. This only patches the desktop
launcher, but running it from terminal it could still fail. You could rename
the binary and make a small wrapper. It's not a blocker and you can address it
at your leisure. If you have a tracker for it can you also add it in the
comment?
Be careful when you `fedpkg import` that the srpm spec file is outdated and
that that does not overwrite the one that you've made changes to. Also when you
`fedpkg new-sources` you list all the git archive tar balls.
CMake options like `BUILD_OPENCS_TESTS`, `BUILD_COMPONENTS_TESTS` would be good
to turn on, but similarly, you can do it at your leisure.
---
There are a few licenses that you should include (join everything by AND and
indicate some of the sources that are relevant)
```
- bullet: Zlib AND MIT AND BSD-3-clause AND BSL-1.0 AND NTP
- OpenSourceGraph: GPL-2.0-only AND LGPL-2.1-or-later WITH
WxWindows-exception-3.1 AND SGI-B-2.0
```
I have attached the full licensecheck report. Note that this does not really
match the package's reported license, and might be good to double check with
upstream.
---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* zlib License", "GNU
General Public License v3.0 or later", "*No copyright* GNU General
Public License, Version 3", "GNU Library General Public License v2 or
later", "zlib License", "BSD 3-Clause License", "BSD 2-Clause
License", "Apache License 2.0", "MIT License", "MIT License and/or
zlib License", "Boost Software License 1.0", "Khronos License and/or
MIT License", "GNU General Public License, Version 3", "BSD 2-clause
FreeBSD License", "*No copyright* Public domain", "*No copyright* MIT
License", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License v2.0 or later",
"GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address
(Temple Place)]", "GNU General Public License", "GNU Lesser General
Public License v2.1 or later", "Public domain", "GNU General Public
License, Version 2", "Apache License 2.0 and/or MIT License", "GNU
General Public License v2.0 or later", "Creative Commons Attribution
3.0", "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License 2.0", "Mozilla Public
License 2.0", "Apache License 2.0 and/or Khronos License and/or MIT
License", "MIT License and/or The Unlicense", "MIT Open Group
variant", "NTP License", "SIL Open Font License 1.1", "GNU Lesser
General Public License v2.1 or later [obsolete FSF postal address
(Temple Place)]", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License
v2.1 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple Place)]", "GNU
Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1", "GNU Library General
Public License v2 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Temple
Place)]", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later [obsolete
FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "Khronos License", "Historical
Permission Notice and Disclaimer - sell variant", "BSD 3-Clause
License [generated file]", "SGI Free Software License B v2.0", "Apple
MIT License", "BSD 3-Clause License and/or Mozilla Public License
2.0", "Boehm GC License and/or Mozilla Public License 2.0", "*No
copyright* Apache License 2.0". 12954 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in attachement
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[?]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[?]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 254606 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
attached diff).
See: (this test has no URL)
[-]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 2396160 bytes in /usr/share
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: openmw-0.49.0-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
openmw-cs-0.49.0-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
openmw-tools-0.49.0-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
openmw-0.49.0-1.fc43.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp885idw2i')]
checks: 32, packages: 4
openmw.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/openmw/defaults-cs.bin
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utility programs for OpenMW.
openmw.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openmw/defaults-cs.bin
openmw.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openmw/defaults.bin
openmw.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openmw/gamecontrollerdb.txt
openmw.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openmw/openmw.cfg
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-bulletobjecttool
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-essimporter
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-iniimporter
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-launcher
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-navmeshtool
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-wizard
openmw-cs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-cs
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bsatool
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary esmtool
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary niftest
openmw-cs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openmw.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary OpenMW
openmw.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary OpenMW
openmw.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/pixmaps/openmw.png
/usr/share/openmw/resources/openmw.png
openmw.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/openmw/resources/translations/wizard_de.qm
/usr/share/openmw/resources/translations/launcher_de.qm
openmw.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/openmw/resources/vfs/mygui/openmw_mainmenu.skin.xml
/usr/share/openmw/resources/vfs/mygui/openmw_dialogue_window.skin.xml
openmw-cs.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary
/usr/share/applications/org.openmw.cs.desktop env
openmw.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/openmw/resources/vfs/fonts/DejaVuLGCSansMono.ttf
../../../../fonts/dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts/DejaVuLGCSansMono.ttf
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 25 warnings, 19 filtered, 1
badness; has taken 4.9 s
Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: openmw-tools-debuginfo-0.49.0-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
openmw-cs-debuginfo-0.49.0-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
openmw-debuginfo-0.49.0-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpalji_zst')]
checks: 32, packages: 3
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 38 filtered, 0
badness; has taken 24.2 s
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 6
openmw.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/openmw/defaults-cs.bin
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/bin/openmw-bulletobjecttool /lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-essimporter
/lib64/libluajit-5.1.so.2
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-essimporter
/lib64/libyaml-cpp.so.0.8
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-essimporter
/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-iniimporter
/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-launcher
/lib64/libz.so.1
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-launcher
/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-navmeshtool
/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-wizard
/lib64/libz.so.1
openmw.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-wizard
/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
openmw-cs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-cs
/lib64/libMyGUIEngine.so.3.4.3
openmw-cs.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/openmw-cs
/lib64/libz.so.1
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/bsatool
/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/esmtool
/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/bin/niftest
/lib64/libfontconfig.so.1
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utility programs for OpenMW.
openmw.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openmw/defaults-cs.bin
openmw.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openmw/defaults.bin
openmw.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openmw/gamecontrollerdb.txt
openmw.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openmw/openmw.cfg
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-bulletobjecttool
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-essimporter
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-iniimporter
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-launcher
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-navmeshtool
openmw.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-wizard
openmw-cs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw-cs
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bsatool
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary esmtool
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary niftest
openmw-cs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openmw-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openmw.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary OpenMW
openmw.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/pixmaps/openmw.png
/usr/share/openmw/resources/openmw.png
openmw.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/openmw/resources/translations/wizard_de.qm
/usr/share/openmw/resources/translations/launcher_de.qm
openmw.x86_64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/openmw/resources/vfs/mygui/openmw_mainmenu.skin.xml
/usr/share/openmw/resources/vfs/mygui/openmw_dialogue_window.skin.xml
openmw.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/openmw/resources/vfs/fonts/DejaVuLGCSansMono.ttf
../../../../fonts/dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts/DejaVuLGCSansMono.ttf
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 38 warnings, 61 filtered, 1
badness; has taken 3.7 s
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/recastnavigation/recastnavigation/archive/c393777d26d2ff…
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
fa8b901651017b20a38996bbab2d205d244328ed11778b53224282e9884e6c91
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
fa8b901651017b20a38996bbab2d205d244328ed11778b53224282e9884e6c91
https://github.com/OpenMW/osg/archive/43faf6fa88bd236e0911a5340bfbcbc25b3a9…
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
10b9bef6297ca328b70a94e53538c22f764795cfd3aad504a1db16df97d0950b
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
10b9bef6297ca328b70a94e53538c22f764795cfd3aad504a1db16df97d0950b
https://github.com/bulletphysics/bullet3/archive/3.25/bullet3-3.25.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
c45afb6399e3f68036ddb641c6bf6f552bf332d5ab6be62f7e6c54eda05ceb77
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
c45afb6399e3f68036ddb641c6bf6f552bf332d5ab6be62f7e6c54eda05ceb77
https://gitlab.com/OpenMW/openmw/-/archive/openmw-0.49.0/openmw-openmw-0.49…
:
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
37589376be3b4d1b0769e50093f14d015c3a436de4fae5d696a5cbe3247abf22
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
37589376be3b4d1b0769e50093f14d015c3a436de4fae5d696a5cbe3247abf22
Requires
--------
openmw (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
dejavu-lgc-sans-mono-fonts
libGL.so.1()(64bit)
libMyGUIEngine.so.3.4.3()(64bit)
libQt6Core.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6.9)(64bit)
libQt6Gui.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6Gui.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libQt6Svg.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6Svg.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libQt6Widgets.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6Widgets.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libSDL2-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libX11.so.6()(64bit)
libXinerama.so.1()(64bit)
libXrandr.so.2()(64bit)
libavcodec.so.61()(64bit)
libavcodec.so.61(LIBAVCODEC_61)(64bit)
libavformat.so.61()(64bit)
libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit)
libavutil.so.59()(64bit)
libavutil.so.59(LIBAVUTIL_59)(64bit)
libboost_iostreams.so.1.83.0()(64bit)
libboost_program_options.so.1.83.0()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libcollada-dom2.5-dp.so.0()(64bit)
libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit)
libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
libicui18n.so.76()(64bit)
libicuuc.so.76()(64bit)
libjpeg.so.62()(64bit)
libjpeg.so.62(LIBJPEG_6.2)(64bit)
libluajit-5.1.so.2()(64bit)
liblz4.so.1()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libopenal.so.1()(64bit)
libpng16.so.16()(64bit)
libpng16.so.16(PNG16_0)(64bit)
libsqlite3.so.0()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.11)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.13)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.15)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.2)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.7)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
libswresample.so.5()(64bit)
libswresample.so.5(LIBSWRESAMPLE_5)(64bit)
libswscale.so.8()(64bit)
libswscale.so.8(LIBSWSCALE_8)(64bit)
libunshield.so.1()(64bit)
libyaml-cpp.so.0.8()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
openmw-cs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libGL.so.1()(64bit)
libMyGUIEngine.so.3.4.3()(64bit)
libQt6Core.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6.9)(64bit)
libQt6Gui.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6Gui.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libQt6Network.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6Network.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libQt6OpenGLWidgets.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6OpenGLWidgets.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libQt6Svg.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6Svg.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libQt6Widgets.so.6()(64bit)
libQt6Widgets.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit)
libSDL2-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
libboost_iostreams.so.1.83.0()(64bit)
libboost_program_options.so.1.83.0()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libcollada-dom2.5-dp.so.0()(64bit)
libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit)
libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
libjpeg.so.62()(64bit)
libjpeg.so.62(LIBJPEG_6.2)(64bit)
liblz4.so.1()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpng16.so.16()(64bit)
libpng16.so.16(PNG16_0)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.15)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.2)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
libyaml-cpp.so.0.8()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
openmw(x86-64)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
openmw-tools (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
libGL.so.1()(64bit)
libboost_iostreams.so.1.83.0()(64bit)
libboost_program_options.so.1.83.0()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libcollada-dom2.5-dp.so.0()(64bit)
libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit)
libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit)
libjpeg.so.62()(64bit)
libjpeg.so.62(LIBJPEG_6.2)(64bit)
liblz4.so.1()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpng16.so.16()(64bit)
libpng16.so.16(PNG16_0)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.15)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
openmw(x86-64)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
Provides
--------
openmw:
application()
application(org.openmw.launcher.desktop)
bundled(OpenSceneGraph-OpenMW)
bundled(bullet)
bundled(fonts(DemonicLetters))
bundled(fonts(MysticCards))
bundled(recastnavigation)
bundled(sol3)
metainfo()
metainfo(openmw.appdata.xml)
openmw
openmw(x86-64)
openmw-cs:
application()
application(org.openmw.cs.desktop)
openmw-cs
openmw-cs(x86-64)
openmw-tools:
openmw-tools
openmw-tools(x86-64)
Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n openmw
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Ocaml, Java, SugarActivity, R, PHP, Haskell, Perl, Python,
fonts
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379721
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…