Thanks François, for your reply.

The goal, is to have the service IPA available always, if the server 1 will be down, and also for load sharing.

I thought about roundrobin dns, but sharing service is not mastered for effective sharing and the life test is not present.

Bien à vous

Mr Karim Bourenane
+33686464439
+32493866354
 


Le mar. 11 juin 2019 à 14:03, François Cami <fcami@redhat.com> a écrit :
Hi Karim,

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 1:56 PM Karim Bourenane via FreeIPA-users
<freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org> wrote:
>
> Hello team
>
> Hope you are well.
>
> After an existing installation, we decide to implement a Haproxy + Keepalive in all our IPA's servers.
>
> The haproxy / keepalive work weel but now the IPA doent run weel, because he want to listen on all interface in the servers.
>
> Ho i can to modify the IPA (+ all modules KRB5/DNS...) conf server, to bind only in  1 local interface and not to the VIP interface ?

Binding to the local interface is in no way expected and will result
in some components not working.

I am not aware of any scenario where adding HAProxy+Keepalived in
front of FreeIPA would provide a tangible benefit. Could you please
explain the reasoning behind such a decision?

Regards,
François

> King regard
> _______________________________________________
> FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org