Thanks François, for your reply.
The goal, is to have the service IPA available always, if the server 1 will
be down, and also for load sharing.
I thought about roundrobin dns, but sharing service is not mastered for
effective sharing and the life test is not present.
Bien à vous
Mr Karim Bourenane
+33686464439
+32493866354
Le mar. 11 juin 2019 à 14:03, François Cami <fcami(a)redhat.com> a écrit :
Hi Karim,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 1:56 PM Karim Bourenane via FreeIPA-users
<freeipa-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org> wrote:
>
> Hello team
>
> Hope you are well.
>
> After an existing installation, we decide to implement a Haproxy +
Keepalive in all our IPA's servers.
>
> The haproxy / keepalive work weel but now the IPA doent run weel,
because he want to listen on all interface in the servers.
>
> Ho i can to modify the IPA (+ all modules KRB5/DNS...) conf server, to
bind only in 1 local interface and not to the VIP interface ?
Binding to the local interface is in no way expected and will result
in some components not working.
I am not aware of any scenario where adding HAProxy+Keepalived in
front of FreeIPA would provide a tangible benefit. Could you please
explain the reasoning behind such a decision?
Regards,
François
> King regard
> _______________________________________________
> FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
freeipa-users-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedoraho...