thanks for the explanation of the source of this conflict. i manually
added the other member and removed the conflict.
On 6/1/21 11:33 AM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 08:50:43PM +0200, Stijn De Weirdt via FreeIPA-users wrote:
>> hello all,
>> in our setup ipa-healthcheck reports an issue with a replication
>> conflict on "dn: cn=Enterprise ACME Administrators,ou=groups,o=ipaca"
>> the conflict and valid entry are almost identical:
>>> Valid Entry:
>>> dn: cn=Enterprise ACME Administrators,ou=groups,o=ipaca
>>> cn: Enterprise ACME Administrators
>>> description: ACME RA accounts
>>> objectClass: top
>>> objectClass: groupOfUniqueNames
>>> uniqueMember: uid=acme-master2.domain,ou=people,o=ipaca
>>> uniqueMember: uid=ipara,ou=people,o=ipaca
>> with the conflicting entry the same, except for the line
>>> uniqueMember: uid=acme-master1.domain,ou=people,o=ipaca
>> i would like some guidance what this means and how to proceed: delete
>> the conflicting entry, swap to the conflicting entry, merge it (somehow)
> Hello Stijn. This conflict probably arose during simultaneous
> upgrade or installation of multiple replicas.
> To remediate, merge the entry: keep all uniqueMember values from
> both the conflict and prevailing entries.
>> many thanks,
>> FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: