On 11/27/18 3:03 PM, Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-devel wrote:
Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
> On 10/24/18 10:49 PM, Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-devel wrote:
>> I started a design of an IPA healthcheck framework at
>>
https://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Healthcheck
>>
>> Have at it.
>>
>> Note that this concentrates more on how it will work big picture and
>> less on individual checks that may be performed. I'm happy to add any
>> ideas you come up with for specific tests.
>>
>> rob
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeIPA-devel mailing list -- freeipa-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> freeipa-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>>
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-devel@lists.fedoraho...
>>
>>
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> thanks for the design. One minor question: is there a rationale for
> defining an AUXILIARY class instead of STRUCTURAL for
> ipaHealthCheckObject and ipaHealthCheckSolutionObject?
Mostly because I don't expect anything to extend it. I have no objection
to making it STRUCTURAL if you think that would be better.
I have a different reasoning for STRUCTURAL vs AUX: if the object is
self-standing (ie would contain only this oc and top) I use STRUCTURAL
but if it's used to extend another one I favor AUXILIARY.
Not a big deal anyway...
flo
rob
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-devel mailing list -- freeipa-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-devel@lists.fedoraho...