[freeipa PR#2544][opened] Add sysadm_r to default SELinux user map order
by fcami
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2544
Author: fcami
Title: #2544: Add sysadm_r to default SELinux user map order
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
It is a standard SELinux user role included in RHEL (like
user_r, staff_r, guest_r) and used quite often.
See: https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/7658
So far the upgrade process is not covered, only new install.
I suppose a file like ./install/updates/50-ipaconfig.update has to be created for upgrades to be covered.
Without the change to the ldif:
SELinux user map order:
guest_u:s0$xguest_u:s0$user_u:s0$staff_u:s0-s0:c0.c1023$unconfined_u:s0-s0:c0.c1023
New install with the change to the ldif:
SELinux user map order:
guest_u:s0$xguest_u:s0$user_u:s0$staff_u:s0-s0:c0.c1023$sysadm_u:s0-s0:c0.c1023$unconfined_u:s0-s0:c0.c1023
"""
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghfreeipa https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa
git fetch ghfreeipa pull/2544/head:pr2544
git checkout pr2544
5 years, 4 months
Gating and nightly tests
by Florence Blanc-Renaud
Hi Developers,
Currently our test suite contains 3 different test sets:
- gating: executed on each pull request
- nightly_master: executed monday, wednesday, friday
- nightly_rawhide: not executed
Some tests are part of both gating and nightly, but that is an
exception. The majority of gating tests are not part of nightly, and
this was a choice done earlier in the project.
Christian raised a concern with this decision (see
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/2540#issuecomment-437078271) and
would like nightly to also contain all the gating tests.
So what's your opinion on this? Should we keep gating and nightly
disjoint or make gating a subset of nightly?
I don't have any strong opinion on this, except that we should be
consistent...
flo
5 years, 4 months