https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851825
Bug ID: 851825
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: low
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Summary: Need consistent naming of glyphs across entire font
family
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: All
Reporter: deron.meranda(a)gmail.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: All
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: liberation-fonts
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Among all the different fonts within the Liberation family the naming of glyphs
and mappings to Unicode codepoints should be consistent.
For example, the glyph named "fi" maps to U+FB01 in LiberationMono-Regular.sfd,
but to U+F001 in LiberationSans-Italic.sfd.
Also, for the reverse mappings, the Unicode codepoint U+00B7 maps to glyph
"middot.001" in LiberationMono-BoldItalic.sfd, but to a glyph named
"middot" in
LiberationSans-Regular.sfd and to "uni00B7" in LiberationSerif-Bold.sfd.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
liberation-fonts-2.00.0
Expected results:
All the fonts in the font family should use consistent glyph names and unicode
codepoints (when a particular character is in the font).
Additional info:
The attachment lists all these inconsistencies. I've excluded cases where a
particular glyph/character is not included in one font.
Note that many of these are simply cases where:
* A glyph is not named (e.g., of the form "uniXXXX")
* A glyph has no unicode assignment (value 1)
Also in a few cases there are glyphs that have multiple unicode codepoint
assignments — see Bug #851790
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.