Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
Summary: [ta_IN][GPOS]" U+0BB[8-9] U+0BC2" have error results. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfahbo@redhat.com ReportedBy: xinsun@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Created an attachment (id=344553) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344553) 0BB8-0BC2.jpg
Description of problem: When inputing "U+0BB8 U+0BC2" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC2" in gedit, the results were wrong.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64
How reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce: 1.Select "RAW CODE" in scim-bridge 2.Input "U+0BB8 U+0BC2" or "U+0BB9 U+0BC2" in gedit.
Actual results: The result are
U+0BB8 U+0BC2 ஸூ
U+0BB9 U+0BC2 ஹூ
and they are different from the correct images.
Expected results: Please see the attachment: 0BB8-0BC2.jpg and 0BB9-0BC2.jpg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
--- Comment #1 from XinSun xinsun@redhat.com 2009-05-18 23:35:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344554) 0BB9-0BC2.jpg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
--- Comment #2 from XinSun xinsun@redhat.com 2009-05-18 23:36:30 EDT --- "U+0B9C U+0BC2" has the same problem. Actural results: "U+0B9C U+0BC2" ஜூ
Expected results: Please see the attachment 0B9C-0BC2.jpg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
--- Comment #3 from XinSun xinsun@redhat.com 2009-05-18 23:37:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344555) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344555) 0B9C-0BC2.jpg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
Parag pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ifelix@redhat.com, | |pnemade@redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(ifelix@redhat.com | |)
--- Comment #4 from Parag pnemade@redhat.com 2009-09-04 02:35:44 EDT --- felix, Can you give correct image for following combination?
1) U+0BB8 U+0BC2 2) U+0BB9 U+0BC2 3) U+0B9C U+0BC2
Or you can just tell us if above(comment#1 and comment#3) attached images are the correct rendering for these combinations?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
Parag pnemade@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|besfahbo@redhat.com |pnemade@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
sandeep shedmake sshedmak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sshedmak@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from sandeep shedmake sshedmak@redhat.com 2009-09-20 10:20:58 EDT --- The character classes for the aforementioned characters (forming respective syllable combination) are defined correctly in pango-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386.
Additionally, I noticed "serafettin-cartoon-fonts" yields correct/desired results for following combination:
1) U+0BB8 U+0BC2 2) U+0BB9 U+0BC2 3) U+0B9C U+0BC2
Whereas, lohit-tamil-fonts fails to give correct results for above combination.
I have filed a bug against lohit-tamil-fonts (see bug 524457). I have attached corrected font file in the same bug, which yields the expected results.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
sandeep shedmake sshedmak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |524457
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
sandeep shedmake sshedmak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ifelix@redhat.com | |) |
--- Comment #6 from sandeep shedmake sshedmak@redhat.com 2009-09-23 01:33:05 EDT ---
From Comment #5,
Correct behaviour of following combination:
1) U+0BB8 U+0BC2 2) U+0BB9 U+0BC2 3) U+0B9C U+0BC2
can now be obtained from build lohit-tamil-fonts-2_4_4-1_fc12 (available in Rawhide).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
Bug 501422 depends on bug 524457, which changed state.
Bug 524457 Summary: [ta_IN] Anchor Point class for 0BC1 and OBC2 should not be "abvm" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524457
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501422
sandeep shedmake sshedmak@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com | |, psatpute@redhat.com Component|pango |lohit-tamil-fonts Depends on|524457 | Resolution| |DUPLICATE AssignedTo|pnemade@redhat.com |psatpute@redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from sandeep shedmake sshedmak@redhat.com 2009-09-23 01:52:40 EDT ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 524457 ***
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org