Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: License tag doesn't matches the actual license.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
Summary: License tag doesn't matches the actual license. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: smc-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute@redhat.com ReportedBy: tagoh@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute@redhat.com, rajeeshknambiar@gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Description of problem: the spec file says smc-suruma-fonts is licensed under GPLv3+ with exceptions, but COPYING.txt in the archive doesn't mention about any '+'. also smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts is licensed under GPLv3+ with exceptions, but COPYING.txt says: you are free do do anything (free as in free-speech). for more info contact: blahblahblah
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): smc-fonts-04.2-5.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |568230
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|License tag doesn't matches |[ml_IN] License tag doesn't |the actual license. |matches the actual license.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
--- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com 2010-02-25 02:00:48 EST --- I am fixing suruma license
about AnjaliOldLipi
I had some communication with upstream Kevin and he says its GNU GPL, http://kevinsiji.wordpress.com/gnu-gpl/
so bit confusing right now, so for the time being i will remove this subpackage from smc-fonts, once license will be clear, we will add it again.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net 2010-02-25 04:22:34 EST --- When the legal documentation bundled with a font says X, and upstream has confirmed by mail he wanted Y, you can add upstream's mail statement as %doc in the package (upstream should still fix its release, but that will give you more time)
For a practical examplesee the sniglet review request (a spot package, so he should know how to make legal stuff work)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
--- Comment #3 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com 2010-02-25 05:19:43 EST --- thats look good i will do that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-25 10:03:00 EST --- smc-fonts-04.2-6.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smc-fonts-04.2-6.fc13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from Pravin Satpute psatpute@redhat.com 2010-02-25 10:04:26 EST --- thanks nicholas for tip :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-02-26 06:48:33 EST --- smc-fonts-04.2-6.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update smc-fonts'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F13/FEDORA-2010-2977
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-17 23:26:22 EDT --- smc-fonts-04.2-6.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568229
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |smc-fonts-04.2-6.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA
fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org